Scientometrics

, Volume 105, Issue 2, pp 1239–1252 | Cite as

Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis

  • Claudio A. Bonilla
  • José M. Merigó
  • Carolina Torres-Abad
Article

Abstract

Bibliometrics is a research field that studies quantitatively the bibliographic material. This study analyzes the academic research developed in Latin America in economics between 1994 and 2013. The article uses the Web of Science database in order to collect the information and provides several bibliometric indicators including the total number of publications and citations, and the h-index. The results indicate that Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Argentina and Colombia are the only countries with a significant amount of publications in economics in Web of Science although Costa Rica and Uruguay have considerable results in per capita terms. The annual evolution shows a significant increase during the last 5 years that seems to continue in the future, probably with the objective of reaching similar standards than the most competitive countries around the World. The results also show that development, agricultural and health economics are the most significant topics in the region.

Keywords

Latin America Economics Bibliometrics Web of Science 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editors, the anonymous reviewers and Eduardo Engel (University of Chile), for valuable comments that have improved the quality of the paper.

Supplementary material

11192_2015_1747_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)

References

  1. Axarloglou, K., & Theoharakis, V. (2003). Diversity in economics: An analysis of journal quality perceptions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1402–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltagi, B. H. (2007). Worldwide econometrics rankings: 1989–2005. Econometric Theory, 23(5), 952–1012.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjork, S., Offer, A., & Söderberg, G. (2014). Time series citation data: The Nobel Prize in economics. Scientometrics, 98(1), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonilla, C., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Leading institutions in economics in Latin America. CQN Working Papers, 2015-05, University of Chile, Chile.Google Scholar
  5. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Combes, P. P., & Linnemer, L. (2003). Where are the economists who publish? Publication concentration and rankings in Europe based on cumulative publications. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1250–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coupé, T. (2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1309–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies, J. B., Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2008). Economics research in Canada: A long-run assessment of journal publications. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(1), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Du, Y., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2012). A bibliometric account of Chinese economics research through the lens of the China Economic Review. China Economic Review, 23(4), 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dusansky, R., & Vernon, C. J. (1998). Rankings of US economics departments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García-Castrillo, P., Montañés, A., & Sanz-Gracia, F. (2002). A worldwide assessment of scientific production in economics (1992–1997). Applied Economics, 34, 1453–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harzing, A. W., & Mijnhardt, W. (2015). Proof over promise: Towards a more inclusive ranking of Dutch academics in economics and business. Scientometrics, 102(1), 727–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudson, J. (2013). Ranking journals. The Economic Journal, 123(570), F202–F222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (1999). European economics: An analysis based on publications in the core journals. European Economic Review, 43(4), 1150–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2011). An updated ranking of academic journals in economics. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1525–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, E. H., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2006). What has mattered to economics since 1970. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirman, A., & Dahl, M. (1994). Economic research in Europe. European Economic Review, 38(3–4), 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2001). The institutional concentration of authors in top journals of economics during the last two decades. The Economic Journal, 111(472), F405–F421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koljatic, M., & Silva, M. (2001). The international publication productivity of Latin American countries in the economics and business administration fields. Scientometrics, 51(2), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laband, D. N. (2013). On the use and abuse of economics journal rankings. The Economic Journal, 123(570), F223–F254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970–1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(2), 640–666.Google Scholar
  24. Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Aström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2015a). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merigó, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015b). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research,. doi: 10.1016/j.busres.2015.04.006.Google Scholar
  27. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2015). Accounting research: A bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review. doi: 10.1111/auar.12109.Google Scholar
  28. Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramos, R., Royuela, V., & Suriñach, J. (2007). An analysis of the determinants in Economics and Business publications by Spanish universities between 1994 and 2004. Scientometrics, 71(1), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodríguez, D. (2006). Publishing performance of Spanish academics: 1970–2004. Spanish Economic Review, 8(4), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scott, L. C., & Mitias, P. M. (1996). Trends in rankings of economics departments in the US: An update. Economic Inquiry, 34(2), 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stern, D. I. (2013). Uncertainty measures for economics journal impact factors. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sternberg, R., & Litzenberger, T. (2005). The publication and citation output of German faculties of economics and social sciences: A comparison of faculties and disciplines based upon SSCI data. Scientometrics, 65(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagstaff, A., & Culyer, A. J. (2012). Four decades of health economics through a bibliometric lens. Journal of Health Economics, 31(2), 406–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu, X., & Gao, Z. (2010). An updated ranking of the economic research institutions in China (2000–2009). China Economic Review, 21(4), 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu, D., & Shi, S. (2015). Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: Using a citation network analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 32, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio A. Bonilla
    • 1
  • José M. Merigó
    • 1
  • Carolina Torres-Abad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management Control and Information SystemsUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations