A temporal analysis of institutional repository research
- 653 Downloads
Due to the vast array of fields that use or have used institutional repositories, and the varying degrees of technology used, it is important to identify the development of the field, institutional repositories, in order to understand the breadth and depth of studies involved. This longitudinal study of the subject terms associated with published journal articles allows for a clearer understanding of the field of institutional repositories as it developed, evolved, and changed over time. This study’s uniqueness lies in its longitudinal nature, and its use of information visualization, multidimensional scaling, and parallel coordinate analysis provide information regarding the field of institutional repositories. The multidimensional scaling and parallel coordinate analysis in conjunction with temporal analysis reveal that institutional repositories transitioned through several development phases. Future studies of institutional repositories will most likely discover evaluation tactics and potential guidelines, resulting in a need for additional case studies. Observations from the parallel coordinate analysis reveal three major themes. The first theme is the maturity of institutional repositories as a field over time, the second is the fluctuation and developmental status of institutional repositories until 2010–2013 (Period IV), and the third theme is the emergence of the discipline information science and library science as the strong generator of institutional repository research. Through the visualization and temporal analysis, information was gained regarding the history, development, and future studies within institutional repositories.
KeywordsInformation visualization Institutional repositories Multidimensional scaling analysis Parallel coordinate analysis Temporal analysis
- Abrizah, A. A., Noorhidawati, A. A., & Kiran, K. K. (2010). Global visibility of Asian universities’ open access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 15(3), 53–73.Google Scholar
- Alonso, O., Gertz, M., Baeza-Yates, R. (2009). Clustering and exploring search results using timeline constructions. Paper presented at 18th ACM conference on information and knowledge management, Hong Kong, China. New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
- Atunes, C., & Oliveira, A. (2001). Temporal data mining: An overview. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Au Yeung, C., & Jatowt, A. (2011). Studying how the past is remembered: Towards computational history through large scale data mining. Paper presented at 20th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
- Chen, J., Sun, L., Zaine, O., & Goebel, R. (2004). Visualizing and discovering web navigational patterns. Paper presented at 7th international workshop on the web and databases, Maison de la Chimie, Paris, France. New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
- Crespo, A., & Garcia-Molina, H. (1997). Awareness services for digital libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 147–171.Google Scholar
- Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://sparc.arl.org/sites/default/files/media_files/instrepo.pdf.
- Cui, Z., Damiani, E., Leida, M., & Viviani, M. (2005). OntoExtractor: A fuzzy-based approach in clustering semi-structured data sources and metadata generation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3681, 112–118.Google Scholar
- Galina Russell, I. (2011). Visibility of academic resources: A critical review of the role of institutional repositories and open access. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 25(53), 159–183.Google Scholar
- Holmes, J., & Mathieson, J. (1999). The status of the deep repository programme in the UK—History and actual situation. ATW-Internationale Zeitschrift fur Kernenergie, 44(11), 647–649.Google Scholar
- Mehta, N., & Dang, S. (2011). Temporal sequential pattern in data mining tasks. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 3(7), 2674–2678.Google Scholar
- Robertson, G., Card, S., & Mackinlay, J. (1989). The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces. Paper presented at 2nd annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on user interface software and technology, Williamsburg, West Virginia. New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
- Smith, M., Staples, T., Bass, M., & Branschofksy, M. (2001). Building digital repositories: A new role for academic libraries. Paper presented at the 64th annual meeting of ASIST, Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.Google Scholar
- Viera, A., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding the inter-observer agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.Google Scholar
- Web of Science Thomson Reuters. Retrieved May 30, 2015 from http://wokinfo.com/citationconnection.
- XLSTAT. Retrieved January 14, 2014 from http://www.xlstat.com/en.