Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?
Questions about gender differences in the workplace usually attract much attention—but often generate more heat than light. To examine gender differences in several facets of scientific productivity and impact, a quantitative, scientometric approach is employed. Analyzing a sample of industrial and organizational psychologists (N authors = 4234; N publications = 46,656), this study raises both questions and concerns about gender differences in research, by showing that female and male I–O psychologists differ with regard to publication output (fewer publications authored by female researchers), impact (heterogeneous, indicator-dependent gender differences), their publication career courses (male researchers’ periods of active publishing last longer and show longer interruptions), and research interests (only marginal gender differences). In order to get a glimpse of future developments, we repeated all analyses with the student subsample and found nearly no gender differences, suggesting a more gender-balanced future. Thus, this study gives an overview over the status quo of gender differences in an entire psychological sub-discipline. Future research will have to examine whether these gender differences are volitional in nature or the manifestation of external constraints.
KeywordsGender differences Research productivity Scientific productivity Impact Psychology
Mathematics Subject Classification62-07
We thank Tracy L. Vanneman from the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, who provided us with their member list under the condition that our results will remain anonymous (i.e., no information about individual authors), and Ulrich Herb and Matthias Müller from the Saarland University and State Library for their support in the planning phase of this project. Finally, we thank the R community for providing the answers to all of our questions on data analyses.
- Adams, A. B., & Simonson, D. (2004). Publications, citations, and impact factors of leading investigators in critical care medicine. Respiratory Care, 49, 276–281.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2009a). The PsycINFO content classification code system. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/class-codes.pdf
- American Psychological Association. (2009b). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/class-codes.pdf
- American Psychological Association. (2011). Practice guidelines for LGB clients: Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/guidelines.aspx.
- American Psychological Association. (2012). Record structure for PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PsycBOOKS and PsycCRITIQUES. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/record-structure.pdf
- American Psychological Association. (2014). Quick reference guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/ebsco.pdf
- American Psychological Association. (2015). PsycINFO(R): A world-class resource for behavioral and social science research. http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo/psycinfo-printable-fact-sheet.pdf
- Aquino, J. (2014). descr: Descriptive statistics (Version 1.0.4). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=descr.
- Bauer, H. P. W., Schui, G., von Eye, A., & Krampen, G. (2013). How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries. Scientometrics, 94, 523–539. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0760-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bowling, N. A., & Burns, G. N. (2010). Scholarly productivity of academic SIOP members: What is typical and what is outstanding. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 47(4), 11–18.Google Scholar
- Champely, S. (2015). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (Version 1.1-2). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr.
- Del Re, A. C. (2013). compute.es: Compute effect sizes (Version 0.2-2). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/compute.es.
- Diodato, V. P. (1994/2012). Dictionary of bibliometrics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Directorate-General for Research and Innovation & European Commission. (2004). Gender and excellence in the making. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/gender-and-excellence-in-the-making-pbKINA21222/
- European Commission. (2014). Policy. http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/index.cfm?pg=policy&lib=gender. Accessed 23 Feb 2015.
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
- García-Pérez, M. A. (2010). Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2070–2085. doi: 10.1002/asi.21372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henderson, M. T., Fijalkowski, N., Wang, S. K., Maltenfort, M., Zheng, L. L., Ratliff, J., et al. (2014). Gender differences in compensation in academic medicine: The results from four neurological specialties within the University of California Healthcare System. Scientometrics, 100, 297–306. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1266-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Javitz, H., Grimes, T., Hill, D., Rapoport, A., Bell, R., Fecso, R., et al. (2010). US academic scientific publishing. Working paper No. SRS 11-201. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srs11201/pdf/srs11201.pdf
- König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2005). Vom Ansehen der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie: Ein Kommentar zu von Rosenstiel (2004) [On the reputation of work and organizational psychology: A comment on von Rosenstiel (2004)]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 49, 102–104. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089.49.2.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Landers, R. N. (2009). A quantitative examination of trends in I–O psychology 2001–2005. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 46(4), 15–23.Google Scholar
- Lee, D. N. (2012). Feministing Friday: On marriage & name changing [blog]. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/feministing-friday-on-marriage-amp-name-changing/
- Nosek, B. A., Graham, J., Lindner, N. M., Kesebir, S., Hawkins, C. B., Hahn, C., et al. (2010). Cumulative and career-stage citation impact of social-personality psychology programs and their members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1283–1300. doi: 10.1177/0146167210378111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641–720. doi: 10.1177/0149206308319533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prozesky, H. (2008). A career-history analysis of gender differences in publication productivity among South African academics. Science Studies, 21(2), 47–67.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version x64 3.1.3). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
- Revelle, W. (2015). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.5.1). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
- Roediger, H. L., III. (2013). Journal impact factors: How much should we care? Observer, 26(7). http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2013/september-2013/journal-impact-factors.html
- Rupp, D. E., & Beal, D. (2007). Checking in with the scientist-practitioner model: How are we doing? The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 45(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
- Sarkar, D. (2008). Lattice: Multivariate data visualization with R. New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org.
- SIOP. (2015a). What are SIOP and I–O Psychologists? http://www.siop.org/joinsiop.aspx. Accessed 23 June 2015.
- SIOP. (2015b). What are the criteria for SIOP membership? http://www.siop.org/joinsiop.aspx. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
- Temple Lang, D. (2013a). RCurl: General network (HTTP/FTP/…) client interface for R (Version 1.95-4.5). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RCurl.
- Temple Lang, D. (2013b). XML: Tools for parsing and generating XML within R and S-Plus (Version 3.98-1.1). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=XML.
- Thomson Reuters. (2013a). Journal citation reports(R) science edition 2012. http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR
- Thomson Reuters. (2013b). Journal citation reports(R) Social science edition 2012. http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR
- Tubr, T., Bly, P. R., Edwards, B. D., Pritchard, R. D., & Simoneaux, S. (2001). Building a better literature review: Reference and information sources for I–O psychology. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 38(4), 55–59.Google Scholar
- Venkatraman, V. (2010). Conventions of scientific authorship. Science Career Magazine. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.a1000039
- Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. CoRR, abs/1501.04431. http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.04431
- White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 87–108. doi: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<:AID-ASI1542>3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wickham, H. (2007). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12). www.jstatsoft.org/v21/i12/paper.
- Wickham, H. (2011). The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(1). http://www.jstatsoft.org/v40/i01/paper.
- Wickham, H. (2012). stringr: Make it easier to work with strings (Version 0.6.2). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr.