Scientometrics

, Volume 104, Issue 2, pp 511–528 | Cite as

Investigation of the degree to which articles supported by research grants are published in open access health and life sciences journals

Article

Abstract

In the scientific publication world, there are an increasing number of open access (OA) journals. Many OA journals are financed by the article processing charges (APCs) that they charge authors. There is considerable interest in the funding source of such APCs. In 255 health and life sciences OA journals that charge APCs (APC OA journals) and 183 health and life sciences OA journals that do not charge APCs (free OA journals) that are indexed in the Thomson Reuters Web of Science, this study uses a bibliometric method to examine the relationship between two journal characteristics during 2009–2013: APCs and the percentage of published articles based on work that is supported by grants (grant-funded articles). According to the data collected, the percentage of grant-funded articles increases as the associated APCs increase. Average APCs of APC OA journals are higher in Europe and North America than elsewhere. The study also investigated the top ten countries in the number of scientific publications in the OA journals investigated. All ten countries had lower percentages of grant-funded articles in free OA journals than in APC OA and subscription journals. Of the ten countries, six in Europe and North America have higher percentages of grant-funded articles in APC OA journals than in subscription journals. The other four countries that have lower percentages of grant-funded articles in APC OA journals than in subscription journals are in Asia and South America, which are places where APC OA journals have low average APCs.

Keywords

Open access Article processing charge Grants Authors Scientific publications Bibliometric investigation 

References

  1. Björk, B. C. (2012). The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1496–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Björk, B. C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Darby, R., Goerner, B., Hyppoelae, J., Igo-Kemenes, P., Kahn, D., et al. (2011). Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists think about open access publishing. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1101.5260.Google Scholar
  4. Eysenbach, G. (2006). The open access advantage. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2), e8. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39–46.Google Scholar
  6. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B. C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Prosser, D. C. (2003). From here to there: A proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access. Learned Publishing, 16(3), 163–166.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Shattil, S. J. (2004). Open access, yes! Open excess, no! Blood, 103(9), 3257.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012a). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012b). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomson Reuters. (2011). Funding acknowledgements. Retrieved http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/fundingsearch/
  14. Xia, J. F., Myers, R. L., & Wilhoite, S. K. (2011). Multiple open access availability and citation Impact. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LibraryNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Electronic Science and EngineeringNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations