, Volume 104, Issue 2, pp 407–424 | Cite as

Sectoral systems of innovation: the case of robotics research activities

  • Gita GhiasiEmail author
  • Vincent Larivière


Robotics technology holds a significant promise for improving industrial automation and production lines, operating complex surgical procedures, performing space and security missions, and providing services to assist, educate and entertain humans. The emphasis of this paper is primarily on the scientific developments of robotics systems of innovation in a global perspective, identifying actors and institutions involved in developing and diffusing this innovative technology. This quantitative research is grounded on tech mining research method that is the combination of content analysis, bibliometrics and text mining. The analysis measures the scientific performance of individual countries based on robotics-related scientific publications from INSPEC database over the period 1995–2009. It discusses the role of academia, governmental institutions and firms in robotics scientific activities and further identifies the most prolific institutions involved in robotics research. The cross-country analysis sheds light on the evolution of robotics publication activities in time and reveals the relative technological specialization of individual countries in specific domains of robotics technology by the use of revealed technological advantage indices. The findings are particularly useful for science and technology policy makers and R&D strategists, presenting strengths and weaknesses of robotics innovation systems and existing and future scientific developments of robotics technology.


Robotics Systems of innovation Bibliometrics Tech mining Science and technology policy 

JEL Classification




The authors would like to thank Professor Krzysztof Klincewicz for his invaluable suggestions, comments and contributions to this research and to acknowledge Erasmus Mundus Fellowship Program from the European Commission which in part supported the study in this article.


  1. Bekey, G. A., Ambrose, R., Kumar, V., Sanderson, A., Wilcox, B., & Zheng, Y. (2006). WTEC panel report on international assessment of research and development in robotics: Final report. World Technology Evaluation Center. Accessed 8 June 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, G., & Callon, M. (1994). Techno-economic networks and science and technology policy. STI Review, 14, 67–126.Google Scholar
  3. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2006). From theory to practice: the use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. Innovation, science and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Edquist, C. (2001). The SYSTEMS of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. In DRUID Conference, Aalborg (pp. 12–15).Google Scholar
  7. Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (1999). Systems of innovation: Theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society, 21(1), 63–79. Accessed 9 June 2014.Google Scholar
  8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EUROP. (2006). Strategic research agenda. Retrieved from Accessed 16 July 2014.
  10. Forge, S., & Blackman, C. (2010). A Helping Hand for Europe. Retrieved from Accessed 16 July 2014.
  11. Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research policy, 20(5), 499–514. Accessed 9 June 2014.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia, E., Jimenez, M. A., De Santos, P. G., & Armada, M. (2007). The evolution of robotics research. Robotics and Automation Magazine, IEEE, 14(1), 90–103. Accessed 9 June 2014.Google Scholar
  13. Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6), 897–920. Accessed 17 September 2013.Google Scholar
  14. Gelin, R., & Christensen, H. (2005). Building the European robotics platform—EUROP, sectoral report on service robotics. Retrieved from Accessed 16 July 2014.
  15. Islam, N., & Miyazaki, K. (2009). Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 128–140. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klincewicz, K., & Miyazaki, K. (2011). Sectoral systems of innovation in Asia. The case of software research activities. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(2), 161–189. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2011.038589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: An analytical framework. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  18. Lundvall, B. (2007). National innovation systems—Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miyazaki, K., & Islam, N. (2007). Nanotechnology systems of innovation—An analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation, 27(11), 661–675. Accessed 6 January 2014.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nesta, L., & Patel, P. (2005). National patterns of technology accumulation: Use of patent statistics. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 531–551). Springer. Accessed 7 May 2015.
  23. Nooteboom, B., & Stam, E. (2008). Micro-foundations for innovation policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris.Google Scholar
  25. Porter, A. L., & Cunningham, S. W. (2004). Tech mining: exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Rehn, C., & Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Huddinge: Karolinska Institutet.Google Scholar
  27. World Robotics. (2013). Executive summary. Retrieved from Accessed 16 July 2014.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Organization Theory and Methods, Faculty of ManagementUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Ecole de bibliotheconomie et des sciences de l’informationUniversite de MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations