, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 779–794 | Cite as

Somes patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: the current situation and challenges

  • Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez
  • Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge
  • Félix de Moya-Anegón
  • Elena Corera-Álvarez


Cuban scientific output is analyzed for the period 2003–2011, in Scopus database. Based on a set of bibliometric indicators, we try to shed light on the evolution of the volume of scientific output in Cuban and foreign journals, and its distribution and visibility by quartiles. Also analyzed is the citation per document received, broken down by language of publication and type of collaboration. The results reveal patterns and strategies of expansion in scientific communication that may be useful for academic and institutional decision-makers, suggesting means of amending editorial policy to improve scientific quality and international diffusion of output. It is hoped that these results will spur debate about research policies and actions to be taken to enhance the quality of research.


Cuba Journals Language of publication Citation Scientific collaboration Scopus 

Mathematical subject classification

62-XX 91-XX 

JEL Classification

Y1 Data Tables and Charts 



This work was made possible through the Short-Term Visiting Fellows Program of the CSIC Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP) Madrid, Spain.


  1. Araujo-Ruíz, J. A., Torricella-Morales, R. G., Van Hooydonk, G., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2005). Cuban scientific articles in ISI citation indexes and CubaCiencias databases (1988–2003). Scientometrics, 65, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). Challenges in the study of Cuban scientific output. Scientometrics, 83, 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arencibia-Jorge, R., Vega-Almeida, R. L., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Patrones de especialización de la investigación nacional sobre Salud. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 38(5). Accessed 25 January 2014.
  4. Bornmann, L., Moya-Anegón, F., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The new excellence indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Benavent-Pérez, M., Miguel, S., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2223–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Miguel, S., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014a). Some interesting performance results of Latin-American scientific activity in Scopus database (20032011). Working Paper 2014-3.Google Scholar
  7. Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Zacca-González, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014b). Latino American scientific output in Public Health: Combined analysis of bibliometrics, socioeconomics and health indicators. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1349-9.Google Scholar
  8. Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Miguel, S., Moya-Anegón, F. (2015). What factors are affecting the visibility of Argentinean publications in human and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidences beyond the geographic realm of the research. Scientometrics, 102(1), 789–810. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1414-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: The effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collazo-Reyes, F., Luna-Morales, M. E., Russell, J. M., & Pérez-Angón, M. A. (2008). Publication and citation patterns of Latin American and Caribbean journals in the SCI and SSCI from 1995 to 2004. Scientometrics, 75(1), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorta-Contreras, A. J. (2007) Visibilidad e impacto de las ciencias médicas cubanas: A propósito de los premios anuales de la salud 2006 en artículo científico. Acimed, 16(3). Accessed 2 February 2014.
  12. Dorta-Contreras, A. (2008). Evidenciar la ciencia cubana. Acimed, 17(2). Accessed 19 December 2013.
  13. Dorta-Contreras, J. A., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Martí-Lahera, Y., & Araujo-Ruiz, J. A. (2008). Productividad y visibilidad de los neurocientíficos cubanos: Estudio bibliométrico del período 2001–2005. Revista de Neurología, 47, 355–360.Google Scholar
  14. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & De Roue, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration network and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1992–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Camí, J. (1995). Analysis of biomedical research in Spain. Research Policy, 24(3), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journal’s scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guzmán-Sánchez, M. V., Sanz-Casado, E., & Sotolongo-Aguilar, G. (1998). Bibliometric study on vaccines (1990–1995) part I: Scientific production in Iberian-American countries. Scientometrics, 43, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrero-Solana, V., & Moya-Anegón, F. (1999). Science in America Latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators. Scientometrics, 46(2), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacsó, P. (2009). Errors of omission and their implications for computing scientometric measures in evaluating the publishing productivity and impact of countries. Online Information Review, 33, 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeremić, V., Jovanović-Milenković, M., Radojičić, Z., & Martić, M. (2013). Excellence with leadership: The crown indicator of SCImago Institutions Rankings Iber Report. El Profesional de la Información, 22(5), 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lancaster, F. W., Porta, M. A., Plagenz, K., Szymborski, K., & Krebs, M. (1986). Factors influencing sources cited by scientists: A case study for Cuba. Scientometrics, 10, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lancho-Barrantes, B., Guerrero-Bote, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? Bio Science, 55, 438–443.Google Scholar
  27. Luna-Morales, M. E., & Collazo-Reyes, F. (2007). Análisis histórico bibliométrico de las revistas latinoamericanas y caribeñas en los índices de la ciencia internacional 1961–2005. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 30(4), 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meske, W., & Fernández de Alaiza, M. C. (1990). Structure and development of the scientific and technological potential in the Republic of Cuba. Scientometrics, 18, 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miguel, S. (2011). Revistas y producción científica de América Latina y el Caribe: su visibilidad en SciELO, RedALyC y SCOPUS. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 34(2), 187–199.Google Scholar
  30. Molina-Molina, M. S., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2013) Política nacional y visibilidad internacional. El caso colombiano. El Profesional de la Información, 22(6), 529–535.Google Scholar
  31. Moral, L. P. (1989). Elements for a diagnosis of applied research and development in Cuba using patent information: 1968–1983. Scientometrics, 17, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., & Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Bornmann, L., & Moed, H. (2013). The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: A promising new approach. Scientometrics, 97, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Núñez-Jover, J., & López-Cerezo, J. A. (2008). Technological innovation as social innovation: Science, technology, and the rise of STS studies in Cuba. Science, Technology and Human Values, 33, 707–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehn, C., & Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library. Version 1.05.Google Scholar
  36. Rodríguez-Yunta, L., & Giménez-Toledo, E. (2013). Fusión, coedición o reestructuración de revistas científicas en humanidades y ciencias sociales. El Profesional de la Información, 22(1), 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sancho, R., Bernal, G., & Galvez, L. (1993). Approach to the cuban scientific activity by using publication based quantitative indicators (1985–1989). Scientometrics, 28, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Santa, S., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010a). Producción científica de América Latina y el Caribe: Una aproximación a través de los datos Scopus (1996–2007). Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 33(2), 379–400.Google Scholar
  39. Santa, S., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010b). Cobertura de la ciencia de América Latina y el Caribe en Scopus vs Web of Science. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 24(52), 13–27.Google Scholar
  40. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SCImago. (2007). SJRSCImago Journal & Country Rank. Accessed 9 January 2014.
  42. SCImago (2013). SIRSCImago Institutions Rankings. Accessed 9 January 2014.
  43. Shrum, W. (1997). View from afar: ‘Visible’ productivity of scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics, 40(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silva-AyÇaguer, L. C. (2011). El arbitraje de las revistas médicas, la gestión editorial en red y la calidad de la publicación científica. ACIMED, 22(2). Accessed 10 February 2014.
  45. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spagnolo, F. (1990). Brazilian scientists’ publications and mainstream science: Some policy implications. Scientometrics, 18(3–4), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torricella-Morales, R. G., Van Hooydonk, G., & Araujo-Ruiz, J. A. (2000). Citation analysis of Cuban research. Part 1. A case study: The Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science. Scientometrics, 47, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America’s scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal & Country Rank. BMC Public Health, 14, 632. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2008). Challenges for scientometric indicators: Data demining, knowledge-flow measurements and diversity issues. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zitt, M., Perrot, F., & Barré, R. (1998). The transition from “National” to “Transnational” model and related measures of countries’ performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahari, S., & Bassecoulard, E. (2003). Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation. Scientometrics, 56, 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge
    • 2
    • 3
  • Félix de Moya-Anegón
    • 1
    • 3
  • Elena Corera-Álvarez
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (CSIC-IPP)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Información CientíficaCentro Nacional de Investigaciones CientíficasLa HabanaCuba
  3. 3.SCImago Research GroupMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations