Scientometrics

, Volume 103, Issue 2, pp 649–668 | Cite as

Global trends in scientific production in enology and viticulture in selected emerging economies (BRIC)

  • Jose Luis Aleixandre
  • Jose Luis Aleixandre-Tudó
  • Máxima Bolaños-Pizarro
  • Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the scientific productivity of the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) in viticulture and oenology through bibliometric analyses of articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded database for the period 1993–2012. A total of 1067 research articles were published in 363 domestic and international journals. We highlight important growth during the mentioned period in the published research papers, particularly in China and Brazil over the last 5 years. Papers have been published in numerous journals in a number of subject areas, such as Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura and Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, which are the most productive among the BRIC countries. A social network analysis of collaboration between each of the four BRIC countries was also performed.

Keywords

Scientific productivity and collaboration Network analysis Viticulture and oenology BRIC countries 

References

  1. Albornoz, M. (2014). Política Científica y Tecnológica: Una visión desde América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación. Nº 1. http://www.oei.es/revistactsi/numero1/albornoz.htm. Accessed 28 January, 2014
  2. Aleixandre, J. L., Bordeu, E., Aleixandre-Tudó, J. L., Bolaños, M., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2013). Scientific productivity and collaboration in viticulture and enology in Latin American countries. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria, 40, 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Aleixandre-Tudó, J. L., González Alcaide, G., Ferrer Sapena, A., Aleixandre, J. L., & Du Toit, W. (2012). Bibliometric analysis of publications by South African viticulture and oenology research centres. South African Journal of Science, 108, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Valderrama Zurian, J. C., & González Alcaide, G. (2007). The impact factor of scientific journals: Limitations and alternative indicators (vol. 16, pp. 4–11).Google Scholar
  5. Babini, D. (2011). Acceso abierto a la producción científica de América Latina y el Caribe. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 17, 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Cassi, L., Morrison, A. & Rabellotti, R. (2014). Proximity and scientific collaboration: Evidence from the global wine industry. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 14(05). Accessed 1 December, 2014. http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg1405.pdf
  7. Cassi, L., Morrison, A., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2012). The evolution of trade and scientific collaboration networks in the global wine sector: A longitudinal study using network analysis. Ecomomic Geography, 83, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CIA World Factbook. (2011): Statistic. On line, 25th May 2011. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/br.html. Accessed 22 November, 2013
  9. Cunningham, S. J., & Dillon, S. M. (1997). Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cusmano, L., Morrison, A., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Catching-up trajectories in the wine sector: A comparative study of Chile, Italy and South Africa. World Development, 38, 1588–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glänzel, W., & Veugelers, R. (2006). Science for wine: A bibliometric assessment for wine and grape research for wine-producing and consuming countries. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57, 23–32.Google Scholar
  12. González-Alcaide, G., Alonso Arroyo, A., González de Dios, J., Pérez Sempere, A., Valderrama-Zurian, J. C., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2008a). Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration in Revista de Neurología. Revista de Neurologia, 46, 642–651.Google Scholar
  13. González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurian, J. C., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2008b). Research fronts and collaboration patterns in Reproductive Biology. Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 941–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guilford, J. M., & Pezzuto, J. M. (2011). Wine and health: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 62, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coautorship network of invisible-college and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science, USA, 101, 5200–5205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Neill, J., & Stopnytska A. (2011). Linking GDP growth and equity return. Goldman Sachs. Monthly insights from the office of the chairman.Google Scholar
  19. OIV. (2007). International organization of vine and wine. Paris: Statistics.Google Scholar
  20. Pichon-Riviere, A., Ceballos, R. M., & Briones, E. (2009). Health technology assessment in Latin-America and the Caribbean, facilitators and barriers for international collaboration: A survey. Value in Health, 12, 488–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rojas-Sola, J. I., & Jordá-Albiñana, B. (2009). Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones científicas españolas en la categoría materials science, ceramics de la base de datos JCR (SCI) (1997–2008). Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Ceramica y Vidrio, 48, 255–260.Google Scholar
  22. Sánchez Sosa, J. J. (2008). Professional collaboration between psychologists and other health professionals in healthcare settings in Latin America. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 171–179.Google Scholar
  23. Scherngell, T., & Hu, Y. (2011). Collaborative knowledge production in China. Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45(6), 755–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sidone, O., Haddad, E., & Mena-Chalco, J. (2014). Scholarly publication and collaboration in Brazil: The role of geography. ERSA Conference Papers, 14, 187. Accessed 01 December, 2014. http://www.usp.br/nereus/wp-content/uploads/TD_Nereus_01_2014.pdf
  25. Slobodniková, O., & Nagyová, R. (2011). Global influence of the BRIC countries. In The scale of globalization. Think globally, act locally, change individually in the 21st century (pp. 303–311). Ostrava: University of Ostrava.Google Scholar
  26. Vera-Villarroel, P., López-López, W., Lillo, S., & Silva, L. (2011). La producción científica en psicología latinoamericana: Un análisis de la investigación por países. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43, 95–104.Google Scholar
  27. White, H. D., & McCain, K. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119–186.Google Scholar
  28. World Bank. (2011). Data Word Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose Luis Aleixandre
    • 1
  • Jose Luis Aleixandre-Tudó
    • 1
  • Máxima Bolaños-Pizarro
    • 2
  • Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Tecnología de AlimentosUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Carlos III. MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y en Conocimiento (CSIC-Universidad Politécnica de Valencia)UISYS-Universidad de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations