Scientometrics

, Volume 102, Issue 2, pp 1713–1729

Characterizing highly cited papers in Social Work through H-Classics

  • M. A. Martínez
  • M. Herrera
  • E. Contreras
  • A. Ruíz
  • E. Herrera-Viedma
Article

Abstract

Highly cited papers are an important reference point in a research field. H-Classics is a new identification method of highly cited papers that is based on the H-index and is sensitive to the own characteristics of any research discipline and also its evolution. Recently, Ho (Scientometrics 98(1):137–155, 2014) presented a study on highly cited papers in Social Work area using as selection criterion a citation threshold value equal to 50 citations received. In this paper, we present a new study on the highly cited papers in Social Work discipline which is developed using the concept of H-Classics. This new study provides more precise results and a different vision on Social Work area.

Keywords

H-index Highly cited papers Bibliometric measures Social Work 

References

  1. Albarrán, P., Ortuno, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). The measurement of low- and high-impact in citation distributions: Technical results. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltussen, A., & Kindler, C. (2004). Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Medicine, 30, 902–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure. Journal of Documentation, 4, 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt, J. S., Downing, A., Howard, D., Kofinas, J., & Chasen, S. (2010). Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: The 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(4), 355.e1–355.e7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burrell, Q. L. (2007). On the H-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 170–177.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassar, A., Downey, R., Byrne, D., Molony, D., & Mulhall, K. (2012). The 25 most cited articles in arthroscopic orthopaedic surgery. Arthroscopy, 28(4), 548–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feijoo, J., Limeres, J., Fernández-Varela, M., Ramos, I., & Diz, P. (2013). The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clinical Oral Investigations. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0.
  9. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(60), 417–479.Google Scholar
  10. Garfield, E. (1977). Introducing citation classics. The human side of scientific reports. Current Comments, 1, 5–7.Google Scholar
  11. Garfield, E. (1987). 100 citation classics from the journal of the American Medical Association. Journal of the American Medical Association, 257, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garfield, E. (2013). What is a citation classic? http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics.html. Accessed May 3, 2013.
  13. Gehanno, J., Takahashi, K., Darmoni, S., & Weber, J. (2007). Citation classics in occupational medicine journals. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 33, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greewoodl, E. (1957). Attributes of a profession. Social Work, 2(3), 45–55.Google Scholar
  15. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho, Y. S. (2014). Classic articles on social work field in social science citation index: A bibliometrics analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodge, D., Lacasse, J., & Benson, O. (2012). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals: 2008–09. British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 765–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodge, D. R., & Lacasse, J. R. (2011). Ranking disciplinary journals with the google scholar H-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Bibliometrics in social work. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K., & Lioi, J. (2010). Research on social work practice: A bibliometric evaluation of the first decade. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hui, J., Han, Z., Geng, G., Yan, W., & Shao, P. (2013). The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011. The Angle Orthodontist, 83(3), 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibrahim, G., Snead, O., Rutka, J., & Lozano, A. (2012). The most cited works in epilepsy: Trends in the “citation classics”. Epilepsia, 53(5), 765–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenson, J. M. (2005). Structural factors and the quality of publication in social work journals. Social Work Research, 29, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the H-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly, J., Glynn, R., O’Briain, D., Felle, P., & Mccabe, J. (2010). The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British, 92(4), 1338–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lacasse, J. R., Hodge, D. R., & Bean, K. F. (2011). Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the H-index. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(5), 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levitt, J., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited library and information science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, Z., Wu, F., Yang, L., Sun, Y., Lu, Z., & Yu, W. (2012). Citation classics in main pain research journals. Journal of Anesthesia, 26(1), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lundahl, B., Kunz, C., Brownell, C., Tollefson, D., & Burke, B. (2010). A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: Twenty-five years of empirical studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(2), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martínez, M., Herrera, M., Cobo, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice. doi:10.1177/1049731514522101.
  31. Martínez, M., Herrera, M., López-Gijón, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). H-classics: Characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index. Scientometrics, 98, 1971–1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paladugu, R., Schein, M., Gardezi, S., & Wise, L. (2002). One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World Journal of Surgery, 26(9), 1099–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ponce, F., & Lozano, A. (2010). Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: The citation classics. Journal of Neurosurgery, 112(2), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ponce, F., & Lozano, A. (2011). The most cited works in parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 26(3), 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenberg, A., Tripathi, R., & Blum, J. (2010). The most influential articles in critical care medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 25, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rousseau, R. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus 1(4), pp. 23–25 (in Chinese). An English translation can be found at: http://eprints.rclis.org/7616/.
  37. Seipel, M. M. O. (2003). Assessing publication for tenure. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 79–88.Google Scholar
  38. Sellers, S. L., Perry, R., Mathiesen, S. G., & Smith, T. (2004). Evaluation of social work journal quality: Citation versus reputation approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 143–160.Google Scholar
  39. Slater, T., Scourfield, J., & Sloan, L. (2012). Who is citing whom in social work? A response to Hodge, Lacasse and Benson. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1626–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, D. (2007). Ten citation classics from the New Zealand Medical Journal. New Zealand Medical Journal, 120, 2871–2875.Google Scholar
  41. Stack, S. (2012). Citation classics in suicide and life threatening behavior: A research note. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 42(6), 628–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stack, S. (2013). Citation classics in deviant behavior: A research note. Deviant Behavior, 34(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strothmann, M. (2010). Use of non-social work journals in social work research: Results of a citation analysis. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29(4), 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tam, W., Wong, E., Wong, F., & Cheung, A. (2012). Citation classics in the integrative and complementary medicine literature: 50 frequently cited articles. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 4, e77–e83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tam, W., Wong, E., Wong, F., & Hui, D. (2013). Citation classics: Top 50 cited articles in ‘respiratory system’. Respirology, 18(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thyer, B. (2005). A note from the editor: A comprehensive listing of social work journals. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(4), 310–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thyer, B. (2010). Twenty years of publishing research on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Martínez
    • 1
  • M. Herrera
    • 2
  • E. Contreras
    • 3
  • A. Ruíz
    • 3
  • E. Herrera-Viedma
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social WorkInternational University of La Rioja (UNIR)La RiojaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Sociology III, Distance LearningUniversity of Spain (UNED)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Library ScienceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations