Are significant inventions more diversified?
- 441 Downloads
This study aims at exploring whether significant inventions are more technologically diversified or have more diverse applications, investigating whether there are any innovation laws existing in R&D activities. Based on technology co-classification analysis, we select patent dataset meets the specific standard from the worldwide patent database named Derwent Innovations Index as sample dataset. Three indicators out of four verify the proposed hypotheses, i.e., significant inventions are more diversified in terms of individual invention. The fourth indicator implies that focusing on some core technology domains maybe better for creating significant inventions when R&D activities are considered as a whole. The results are of great theoretical significance by helping us identifying the diversified characteristic laws of significant inventions; moreover, they are of crucial practical meanings to R&D work and technology innovation activities etc.
KeywordsSignificant inventions Technologically diversity Technology co-classification analysis Innovation laws Patent citations TRIZ
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for the important comments. The research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 71073015, 71103064, 71103022; Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of “Ethical issues of high-tech” under Grant No. 12&ZD117; Key Project of the National Social Science Fund of “Promoting the construction of socialist culture and powerful country” under Grant No. 13AZD016; the Project of Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT14XXXX, undetermined).
- Altshuller, H. (2001). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar
- Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. (1995). Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11(2), 362–378.Google Scholar
- de Moura, A. M. M., & Caregnato, S. E. (2010). Co-classification between articles and patents: a study of the interaction between S & T on Brazilian Biotech. Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos, 20(2), 119–132.Google Scholar
- Lam, Y. L. J., & Cistone, P. J. (1973). School structure and technological diversification. Educational Technology, 13(8), 52–55.Google Scholar
- Luan, C., Liu, Z., & Wang, X. (2013). Divergence and convergence: Technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry. Scientometrics, 97(2), 461–475.Google Scholar
- Narin, F. (1994). Patent citation indicators. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 20(8), 42–52.Google Scholar
- Narin, F., Smith, V. M., & Albert, M. B. (1993). What patents tell you about your competition. Chemtech, 23(2), 52–59.Google Scholar
- Persson, O. (2012). BibExcel. from http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/. 2013-05-16.
- Persson, O., & Dastidar, P. G. (2013). Citation analysis to reconstruct the dynamics of Antarctic ozone hole research and formulation of the Montreal Protocol. Current Science, 104(7), 835–840.Google Scholar
- Sismondo, S. (2001). An introduction to science and technology studies. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar