Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 781–791 | Cite as

A descriptive study of inaccuracy in article titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals

  • Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
  • Vicent Montalt-Resurecció
  • Juan Carlos Valderrama-Zurián
Article

Abstract

In a bid for an eye-catching title, many writers use devices such as interrogation and exclamation marks, metaphors, double meanings and vague expressions which do not comply with accepted standards in style manuals of scientific writing. The purpose of this article is to analyse the lack of accuracy of titles in articles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals and to discuss the effect this may have on the reader. A corpus of 1,505 titles included in PubMed and Web of Science between 2009 and 2011 and retrieved under the MeSH major topic “bibliometrics” and other related terms was analyzed. Different types of inaccuracy were identified and a classification was developed and used for this particular study. 23.4 % of the titles contain inaccuracies of some kind. Editorial titles show a higher percentage of these (11.43 %) than original articles (8.83 %) and letters (3.2 %), the most frequent being the inclusion of a question in the title (seen in 30.9 % of the papers), followed by vague and imprecise expressions (17.8 %), acronyms (16.4 %) and double meanings (14 %). Many titles fail to comply with the conventions of scientific writing. A descriptive title accurately reflecting the content of an article would give readers a better idea of its content, help them to decide more rapidly whether they want to read it and facilitate retrieval from bibliographic databases.

Keywords

Research articles Accuracy of titles Writing style Bibliometrics Biomedical journals 

References

  1. Anthony, L. (2001). Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archives of Internal Medicine. (2011) Manuscript criteria and information. Retrieved Dec 13, 2011 from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/misc/ifora.dtl#StructureofManuscript.
  3. Armstrong, J. S. (1989). Readability and prestige in scientific journals. Journal of Information Science, 15, 123–124.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, S. W., Kuo, C. W., & Kuo, C. H. (2012). Research article titles in applied linguistics. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 6(1), A1–A14.Google Scholar
  5. Costas, R., Moreno, L., & Bordons, M. (2008). Overlapping and singularity of MEDLINE, WoS and IME for the analysis of the scientific activity of a region in health sciences. Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 31, 327–343.Google Scholar
  6. Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2006). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, D. (2002). Database searches for qualitative research. The Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90, 290–293.Google Scholar
  8. Goodman, R. A., Thacker, S. B., & Siegel, P. Z. (2001). What’s in a title? A descriptive study of article titles in peer-reviewed medical journals. Science Editor, 24, 75–78.Google Scholar
  9. Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartley, J. (2007). There’s more to the title than meets the eye: Exploring the possibilities. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyland, K. (2002). What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text, 22(529), 557.Google Scholar
  12. Kane, T. S., & Peters, L. J. (1966). A practical rhetoric of expository prose. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neill, U. S. (2007). How to write a scientific masterpiece. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 117, 3599–3602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paiva, C. E., Lima, J. P., & Paiva, B. S. (2012). Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 67, 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sagi, I., & Yechiam, E. (2008). Amusing titles in scientific journals and article citation. Journal of Information Science, 34, 680–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh, S., Suvirya, S., & Chaudhary, R. (2008). Scientific and linguistic precision in titles of papers published as original articles in Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology, 74, 668–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (1st ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Vintzileos, A. M., & Ananth, C. V. (2010). How to write and publish an original research article. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(344), e1–6.Google Scholar
  21. Wang, Y., & Bai, Y. (2007). A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System, 35, 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Whissell, C. (2004). Titles of articles published in the journal psychological reports: changes in language, emotion, and imagery over time. Psychological Reports, 94, 807–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
    • 1
  • Vicent Montalt-Resurecció
    • 2
  • Juan Carlos Valderrama-Zurián
    • 3
  1. 1.UISYS, Instituto de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia López Piñero, CSIC-Universitat de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Departament de Traducció i ComunicacióUniversitat Jaume ICastellóSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Documentación y Tecnologías de la InformaciónUniversidad Católica San VicenteValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations