, Volume 101, Issue 3, pp 1805–1830 | Cite as

The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals

  • Miloš SavićEmail author
  • Mirjana Ivanović
  • Miloš Radovanović
  • Zoran Ognjanović
  • Aleksandar Pejović
  • Tatjana Jakšić Krüger



Digital library Serbian mathematical journals Co-authorship network Connected components Evolutionary trends Collaborative behaviour Author metrics 

Mathematics Subject Classification

05C82 91D30 



Miloš Savić, Mirjana Ivanović and Miloš Radovanović gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development through project Intelligent techniques and their integration into wide-spectrum decision support, No. OI174023. Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Pejović and Tatjana Jakšić Krüger gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development through project Development of new information and communication technologies, based on advanced mathematical methods, with applications in medicine, telecommunications, power systems, protection of national heritage and education, No. III44006.


  1. Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97(21), 11,149–11,152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311, 590–614.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2000). Some analyses of Erdős collaboration graph. Social Networks, 22(2), 173–186.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., & Kaur, J. (2009). Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börner, K., Maru, J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101(Suppl 1), 5266–5273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunson, J.C., Fassino, S., McInnes, A., Narayan, M., Richardson, B., Franck, C., Ion, P., & Laubenbacher, R. (2012). Evolutionary Events in a Mathematical Sciences Research Collaboration Network. arXiv:1203.5158.
  8. Cunningham, S., & Dillon, S. (1997). Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39(1), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding, Y., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. (1998). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval. International Information and Library Review, 30(4), 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dravec Braun, J. (2012). Effects of war on scientific production: Mathematics in Croatia from 1968 to 2008. Scientometrics, 93(3), 931–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821–7826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122653799.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Gollapalli, S. D., Mitra, P., & Giles, C. L. (2011). Ranking authors in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries (pp. 251–254) New York, NY, USA: ACM, JCDL ’11.Google Scholar
  15. Grossman, J. (2002a). The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium, 158, 201–212.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossman, J. (2002b). Patterns of collaboration in mathematical research. SIAM News, 35(9), 8–9.Google Scholar
  17. Grossman, J. W., & Ion, P. D. F. (1995). On a portion of the well known collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium, 108, 129–131.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivanović, D., Surla, D., & Racković, M. (2012). Journal evaluation based on bibliometric indicators and the CERIF data model. Computer Science and Information Systems, 9(2), 791–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalmukov, Y. (2012). Describing papers and reviewers’ competences by taxonomy of keywords. Computer Science and Information Systems, 9(2), 763–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liben-Nowell, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2003). The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 556–559) New York, NY, USA: ACM, CIKM ’03.Google Scholar
  22. Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1462–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific production. Journal of Washington Academy of Science, 16, 317–323.Google Scholar
  25. Mijajlović, Ž., Ognjanović, Z., & Pejović, A. (2010). Digitization of mathematical editions in Serbia. Mathematics in Computer Science, 3(3), 251–263.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Mimno, D., & McCallum, A. (2007). Mining a digital library for influential authors. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries (pp. 105–106) New York, NY, USA: ACM JCDL ’07.Google Scholar
  27. Nascimento, M. A., Sander, J., & Pound, J. (2003). Analysis of SIGMOD’s co-authorship graph. SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman, M. E. J. (2004a). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5200–5205.Google Scholar
  29. Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks I: Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(016), 131.Google Scholar
  30. Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks II: Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(016), 132.Google Scholar
  31. Newman, M. E. J. (2004b). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In E. Ben-Naim, H. Frauenfelder, & Z. Toroczkai (Eds.), Complex networks (Vol. 650, pp. 337–370). Lecture Notes in Physics Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351.Google Scholar
  33. Pao, M. L. (1986). An empirical examination of Lotka’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perc, M. (2010). Growth and structure of Slovenia’s scientific collaboration network. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 475–482.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodriguez, M.A., Bollen, J. (2008). An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 319–328) New York, NY, USA: ACM, CIKM ’08.Google Scholar
  36. Voos, H. (1974). Lotka and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25(4), 270–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miloš Savić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mirjana Ivanović
    • 1
  • Miloš Radovanović
    • 1
  • Zoran Ognjanović
    • 2
  • Aleksandar Pejović
    • 2
  • Tatjana Jakšić Krüger
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations