How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications
- 3.5k Downloads
In this paper an analysis of the presence and possibilities of altmetrics for bibliometric and performance analysis is carried out. Using the web based tool Impact Story, we collected metrics for 20,000 random publications from the Web of Science. We studied both the presence and distribution of altmetrics in the set of publications, across fields, document types and over publication years, as well as the extent to which altmetrics correlate with citation indicators. The main result of the study is that the altmetrics source that provides the most metrics is Mendeley, with metrics on readerships for 62.6 % of all the publications studied, other sources only provide marginal information. In terms of relation with citations, a moderate spearman correlation (r = 0.49) has been found between Mendeley readership counts and citation indicators. Other possibilities and limitations of these indicators are discussed and future research lines are outlined.
KeywordsAltmetrics Impact Story Citation indicators Research evaluation
This study is the extended version of our research in progress paper (RIP) presented at the 14th International Society of Scientometrics & Informetrics Conference (ISSI) Conference, 15-19 July, 2013, Vienna, Austria. We thank the IS team for their support in working with the Impact Story API. This work is partially supported by the EU FP7 ACUMEN project (Grant agreement: 266632). The authors would like to thank Erik Van Wijk from CWTS for his great help in managing altmetrics data. The authors also acknowledge the useful suggestions of Ludo Waltman from CWTS and the fruitful comments of the anonymous referees of the journal.
- Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2006). The limits of bibliometrics for the analysis of the social sciences and humanities literature, International Social Science Council: World social sciences report 2010: Knowledge divides (pp. 251–254). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Armbruster, C. (2007). Access, usage and citation metrics: what function for digital libraries and repositories in research evaluation? Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1088453.
- Bar-Ilan, J. (2012). JASIST@ Mendeley. Presented at ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics, Evanston, IL. Retrieved June 21, 2012 from http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar-ilan/.
- Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social Web. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611/.
- Blecic, D. (1999). Measurements of journal use: An analysis of the correlations between three methods. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 87, 20–25.Google Scholar
- Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2008). Towards usage-based impact metrics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital libraries (JCDL), New York, USA. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/0804.3791v1.pdf.
- Bornmann, L. (2013). Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Retrieved from www.lutz-bornmann.de/icons/impactrevolution.pdf.
- Davis, P. M. (2012). Tweets, and our obsession with alt metrics. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/04/tweets-and-our-obsession-with-alt-metrics/.
- Forta, B. (2008). Sams teach yourself SQL in 10 minutes. USA: Sams Publishing.Google Scholar
- Haustein, S. (2010). Multidimensional journal evaluation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 120–122), Leiden, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2013). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. In 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (pp. 1–12). Digital Libraries. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7300.
- Haustein, S., & Siebenlist, T. (2011). Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 446–457.Google Scholar
- Henning, V. (2010). The top 10 journal articles published in 2009 by readership on Mendeley. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/blog/academic-features/the-top-10-journal-articles-published-in-2009-by-readership-on-mendeley/.
- Hicks, D. & Melkers, J. (2012). Bibliometrics as a Tool for Research Evaluation. In Al Link & Nick Vornatas (Eds.) Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation. Edward Elgar. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/diana_hicks/31.
- Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2012). F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 451–551). Canada: Montréal.Google Scholar
- Lopez-Cozar, E. D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Torres Salinas, D. (2012). Manipulating google scholar citations and google scholar metrics: simple, easy and tempting. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0638.
- Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Priem, J., Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. Retrieved First Monday 15, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570.
- Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Hemminger, B. H. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. ArXiv: 1203.4745v1.Google Scholar
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., and Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
- Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. (2013). A multi-metric approach for research evaluation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 10–12.Google Scholar
- Schlögl, C., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., Jack, K., & Kraker, P. (2013). Download vs. citation vs. readership data: the case of an information systems journals. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, & H. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria (pp. 626-634). Wien: Facultas Verlags und Buchhandels AG.Google Scholar
- Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314–497.Google Scholar
- Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations ? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, & H. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria (pp. 604–611). Wien: Facultas Verlags und Buchhandels AG.Google Scholar
- Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & Bollen., J. (2012). How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads Twitter mentions, and citations. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2461v1.
- Smith, A. G. (1999). A tale of two web spaces; comparing sites using web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 577–592.Google Scholar
- Thelwall, M. (2012a). A history of webometrics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(6), 18–23.Google Scholar
- Torres-Salinas, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, A., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (2013a). Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in web 2.0. Comunicar. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.6595.pdf.
- Waltman, L., & Costas, R. (2013). F1000 Recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: a comparison with citations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi: 10.1002/asi.23040.
- Wouters, P. (1999). The Citation Culture, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Wouters, P., Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht: SURF foundation. Retrieved from http://www.surffoundation.nl/nl/publicaties/Documents/Users%20narcissism%20and%20control.pdf.
- Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2013). How well developed are Altmetrics? Cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (RIP). In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, & H. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria (pp. 876–884). Wien: Facultas Verlags und Buchhandels AG.Google Scholar