, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 2113–2127 | Cite as

Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index

  • Daniel Torres-Salinas
  • Nicolás Robinson-GarcíaEmail author
  • Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo
  • Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras


This paper presents a first approach to analyzing the factors that determine the citation characteristics of books. For this we use the Thomson Reuters’ book citation index, a novel multidisciplinary database launched in 2011 which offers bibliometric data on books. We analyze three possible factors which are considered to affect the citation impact of books: the presence of editors, the inclusion in series and the type of publisher. Also, we focus on highly cited books to see if these factors may affect them as well. We considered as highly cited books, those in the top 5 % of those most highly cited in the database. We define these three aspects and present results for four major scientific areas in order to identify differences by area (science, engineering and technology, social sciences and arts and humanities). Finally, we report differences for edited books and publisher type, however books included in series showed higher impact in two areas.


Book citation index Monographs Highly cited Publishers Databases 



Thanks are due to the anonymous referee for their helpful comments. Nicolás Robinson-García is currently supported by a FPU grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish government. Bryan J. Robinson of the University of Granada Department of Translation and Interpreting revised the final version of the manuscript.


  1. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archambault, E., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century —A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campanario, J. M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect of the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87(1), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (2009). Five decades of citation indexing. International Workshop for Scientometrics. Beijing, China. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from
  8. Georgas, H., & Cullars, J. (2005). A citation study of the characteristics of the Linguistics Literature. College & Research Libraries, 66(6), 496–516.Google Scholar
  9. Gorraiz, J., Purnell, P., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Opportunities and limitations of the book citation index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1388–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86(3), 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473–496). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google books, Google scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lambiotte, R., & Panzarasa, P. (2009). Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leydesdorff, L., & Felt, U. (2012). Edited volumes, monographs and book chapters in the Book Citation Index. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Linmans, A. J. M. (2010). Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link. Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library findings and productivity measures. Scientometrics, 83(2), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Peritz, B. C. (1981). Citation characteristics in library science: Some further results from a bibliometric survey. Library Research, 3(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
  20. Tang, R. (2008). Citation characteristics and intellectual acceptance of scholarly monographs. College & Research Libraries, 69(4), 356–369.Google Scholar
  21. Testa, J. (2010).The book selection process for the Book Citation Index in Web of Science. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from
  22. Torres-Salinas, D., & Moed, H. F. (2009). Library catalog analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study on published book titles in economics. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Jiménez-Contreras, E., & López-Cózar, D. (2012). Towards a ‘book publishers citation reports’. First approach using the ‘book citation index’. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35(4), 615–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Torres-Salinas, D., Rodríguez-Sánchez, R., Robinson-García, N., Fdez-Valdivia, J., & García, J. A. (2013a). Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the book citation index. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 412–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Campanario, J. M. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013b). Coverage, field specialization and impact of scientific publishers indexed in the ‘Book Citation Index’. Online Information Review, in press.Google Scholar
  26. White, H., Boell, S. K., Yu, H., Davis, M., Wilson, C. S., & Cole, F. T. H. (2009). Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1083–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zuccala, A., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1979–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Torres-Salinas
    • 1
  • Nicolás Robinson-García
    • 2
    Email author
  • Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo
    • 2
  • Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras
    • 2
  1. 1.EC3: Evaluación de la Ciencia y de la Comunicación Científica, Centro de Investigación Biomédica AplicadaUniversidad de NavarraMadridSpain
  2. 2.EC3: Evaluación de la Ciencia y de la Comunicación Científica, Departamento de Información y DocumentaciónUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations