Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?
In psychological research there is huge literature on differences between the sexes. Typically it used to be thought that women were more verbally and men more spatially oriented. These differences now seem to be waning. In this article we present three studies on sex differences in the use of tables and graphs in academic articles. These studies are based on data mining from approximately 2,000 articles published in over 200 peer-reviewed journals in the sciences and social sciences. In Study 1 we found that, in the sciences, men used 26 % more graphs and figures than women, but that there were no significant differences between them in their use of tables. In Study 2 we found no significant differences between men and women in their use of graphs and figures or tables in social science articles. In Study 3 we found no significant differences between men and women in their use of what we termed ‘data’ and ‘text’ tables in social science articles. It is possible that these findings indicate that academic writing is now becoming a genre that is equally undertaken by men and women.
KeywordsAcademic writing Textual design Tables Graphs Gender studies
- Cleveland, W. S. (1994). The elements of graphing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Hobart Press.Google Scholar
- Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Heim, A. W. (1970). Intelligence and Personality: Their Assessment and Relationship. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
- Holpuch, A. (2013). Popular science blog is run by a woman—to the surprise of some on Facebook. The guardian. http://gu.com/p/3etf8/tw
- Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences, vol 1: Text. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Park, H. S. (2005). Gender difference in mathematical disposition of middle school students in Korea. In ICMI’05: Proceedings of the 3rd East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
- Peterson, S. S., & Parr, J. (2012). Gender and literacy issues and research: Placing the spotlight on writing. Journal of Writing Research 3(3), 151–161.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 268–302. doi: 10.3102/0002831210372249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar