A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator
- 1.5k Downloads
Mutual information in three (or more) dimensions can be considered as a Triple-Helix indicator of possible synergy in university–industry–government relations. An open-source routine th4.exe makes the computation of this indicator interactively available at the internet, and thus applicable to large sets of data. Th4.exe computes all probabilistic entropies and mutual information in two, three, and, if available in the data, four dimensions among, for example, classes such as geographical addresses (cities, regions), technological codes (e.g. OECD’s NACE codes), and size categories; or, alternatively, among institutional addresses (academic, industrial, public sector) in document sets. The relations between the Triple-Helix indicator—as an indicator of synergy—and the Triple-Helix model that specifies the possibility of feedback by an overlay of communications, are also discussed.
KeywordsIndicator Triple Helix Quadruple Helix Software Information theory Mutual information Mutual redundancy
We thank Øivind Strand for providing data about Tromso. We acknowledge support from the SSK (Social Science Korea) Program funded by the National Research Foundation of South Korea; NRF-2010-330-B00232; Balázs Lengyel acknowledges support from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (PD106290).
- Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Biggiero, L. (1998). Italian industrial districts: A Triple Helix pattern of problem solving. Industry and Higher Eductation, 12(4), 227–234.Google Scholar
- Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67.Google Scholar
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—university–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14–19.Google Scholar
- Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 38–66). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
- Hodgson, G., & Knudsen, T. (2011). Darwin’s conjecture: The search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ivanova, I. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations; available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2573.
- Krippendorff, K. (1980). Q; an interpretation of the information theoretical Q-measures. In R. Trappl, G. J. Klir, & F. Pichler (Eds.), Progress in cybernetics and systems research (Vol. VIII, pp. 63–67). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163–175. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. A. (2013). Mutual redundancies in inter-human communication systems: Steps towards a calculus of processing meaning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology; available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6849.
- Leydesdorff, L., Rotolo, D., & de Nooy, W. (2012). Innovation as a nonlinear process, the scientometric perspective, and the specification of an “Innovation Opportunities Explorer”. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management; available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6235.
- Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Perevodchikov, E., Uvarov, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Measuring synergy in the Russian innovation system. Paper presented at the 12th international conference about the triple helix of university-industry-government relations, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–656.Google Scholar
- Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009). A third window: Natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. West Conshohocken: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
- Ye, F. Y., Yu, S. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations at the country level, and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization; available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1260.