, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 265–281 | Cite as

Environmental sciences research in northern Australia, 2000–2011: a bibliometric analysis within the context of a national research assessment exercise

  • Jayshree Mamtora
  • Jacqueline K. Wolstenholme
  • Gaby Haddow


This paper reports on a bibliometric analysis of environmental sciences research in northern Australia between 2000 and 2011. It draws on publications data for Charles Darwin University (CDU) and James Cook University (JCU) researchers to present a bibliometric profile of the journals in which they publish, the citations to their research outputs, and the key research topics discussed in the publications. Framing this analysis, the study explored the relationship between the two universities’ publications and their ‘fit’ with the environmental sciences field as defined by the Australian research assessment model, Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). The Scopus database retrieved more records than Web of Science, although only minor differences were seen in the journals in which researchers published most frequently and the most highly cited articles. Strong growth in publications is evident in the 12 year period, but the journals in which the researchers publish most frequently differ from the journals in which the most highly cited articles are published. Many of the articles by CDU and JCU affiliated researchers are published in journals outside of the environmental sciences category as defined by Scopus and Web of Science categories and the ERA, however, the research conducted at each university aligns closely with that institution’s research priorities.


Environmental sciences Northern Australia Excellence in Research for Australia Charles Darwin University James Cook University Fields of Research codes 


92 Biology and other natural sciences 


62P12 Applications to environmental and related topics 


Q Agriculture 



We would like to acknowledge David Pendlebury and Steven Werkheiser from Thomson Reuters for providing additional data for this study. Grateful thanks also to Professor Mike Lawes and Dr Penny Wurm at CDU for their comments and feedback in the preparation of this paper.


  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics, 93(3), 1005–1017. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ANZSRC) (2008). Retrieved February 4, 2012, from Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Codes Acess:
  3. Australian Research Council (2012). Retrieved June 4, 2012 from ERA Factsheet Acess:
  4. Australian Research Council. (2012b). Retrieved February 4, 2012, from ERA 2012 Journal List Acess:
  5. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? – A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belter, C. W. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of NOAA’s office of ocean and exploration research. Scientometrics, 95(2), 629–644. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0836-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, D., Genoni, P., & Haddow, G. (2011). FoR codes pendulum: Publishing choices with Australian research assessment. Australia Universities Review, 53(2), 88–98.Google Scholar
  8. Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 1. doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-3-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles Darwin University (2011a). Retrieved June 2, 2012, from Capability statement Access:
  10. Charles Darwin University. (2011b). Retrieved June 2, 2012, from Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods. Strategic Plan 2011–2015. Consultation draft, 16 August 2011 Access:
  11. Gray, E. & Hodkinson, S. Z. (2008). Comparison of Journal Citation Reports and Scopus Impact Factors for ecology and environmental sciences journal. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 54 (Summer). doi: 10.5062/f4ff3q9g.
  12. James Cook University (2012a). Retrieved August 14, 2012, from Research Profile Access:
  13. James Cook University (2012b). Retrieved August 14, 2012, from The JCU Research Plan 2011–2013 Access:
  14. Khan, M. A., & Ho, Y.-S. (2012). Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: Merits and demerits of citation analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 431, 122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Konur, O. (2011). The scientometric evaluation on the research on the algae and bio-energy. Applied Energy, 88(10), 3532–3540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leblond, M. (2012). Author self-citations in the field of ecology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 943–953. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0565-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, J., Wang, M.-H., & Ho, Y.-S. (2011). Trends in research on global climate change: A Science Citation Index-Expanded analysis. Global and Planetary Change, 77(1–2), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, X., Zhang, L., & Hong, S. (2011). Global biodiversity research during 1900–2009: A bibliometric analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20(4), 807–826. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9981-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopresti, R. (2010). Citation accuracy in environmental science journals. Scientometrics, 85(3), 647–655. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0293-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meho, L., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. doi: 10.1002/asi.20677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salisbury, L. (2009). Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative review of content and searching capabilities. The Charleston Advisor, (July), 5–18.Google Scholar
  22. Sun, J., Ni, J., & Ho, Y.-S. (2011). Scientometric analysis of coastal eutrophication research during the period of 1993 to 2008. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13(2), 353–366. doi: 10.1007/s10668-010-9265-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Times Higher Education (2011). Top institutions in Australia and New Zealand for research in environmental sciences and ecology. Retrieved January 10, 2012 from Times Higher Education Access:
  24. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayshree Mamtora
    • 1
  • Jacqueline K. Wolstenholme
    • 2
  • Gaby Haddow
    • 3
  1. 1.Office of Library ServicesCharles Darwin UniversityCasuarinaAustralia
  2. 2.Library and Information ServicesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Information StudiesCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations