Gender bias and explanation models for the phenomenon of women’s discriminations in research careers
- 978 Downloads
In the present paper four myths of gender differences in scientific performance are presented and discussed. The persistence of these myths in different forms of evaluation is influencing the women’s discriminations in research careers in combination with effects explained in other explanation models for the existence of the unseen barrier (glass ceiling) that keeps women from rising to the upper levels of the corporate ladder.
KeywordsGender bias Evaluation Glass ceiling
Part of this work by one of the authors (Kretschmer H) was supported by the 7th Framework Program by the European Commission, SIS-2010-18.104.22.168. Project full title: “Academic Careers Understood through Measurement and Norms”, Project acronym: ACUMEN.
- Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkam (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement 2. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Dasaratha, V. R., Raghunandan, K., Logan, L. B., & Barkman, B. V. (1997). Gender differences in publications by promoted faculty. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), 353–365.Google Scholar
- Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. Cole, & J. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Matthew, Matilda and the others. in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & 12th COLLNET Meeting, 20–23 Sep 2011, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
- Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Gómez-Crisóstomo, R. (2007). Scientific output by gender in Spain (Web of Science, 2004). in 11th International conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, 25–27 June, Madrid.Google Scholar
- Naldi, F., Luzi, D., Valente, A., & Parenti, I. V. (2004). Scientific and technological performance by gender. In H. F. Moed, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 299–314). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sanz-Casado, E., Iribarren-Maestro, I., Garcia-Zorita, C., et al. (2009). Are productivity, impact and visibility indicators appropriate for measuring the quality of research conducted in universities? In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2009—12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (vol. 1, pp. 286–290).Google Scholar
- “She Figures”, published by the European Commission in 2009.Google Scholar
- Thelwall, M., Barjak, F., & Kretschmer, H. (2006). Web links and gender in science: An exploratory analysis. Scientometrics, 67(3), 373–383.Google Scholar
- Ward, K. B., & Grant, L. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education, handbook of theory and research (Vol. XI). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar