Scientometrics

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 221–246 | Cite as

Publication trends and knowledge maps of global translational medicine research

Article

Abstract

Translational medical research literatures have increased rapidly in last decades and there have been fewer attempts or efforts to map global research context of translational medical related research. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the global progress and to assess the current quantitatively trends on translational medical research by using a scientometric approach to survey translational medicine related literatures in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E), Social Science Citation Index and PubMed database from 1992 to 2012. The scientometric methods and knowledge visualization technologies were employed in this paper. The document types, languages, publication patterns, subject categories, journals, geographic and institutional distributions, top cited papers, and the distribution of keywords as well as MeSH terms were thoroughly examined. Translational medicine research has increased rapidly over past 20 years, most notably in the last 4 years. In total, there are currently 3,627 research articles in 1,062 journals listed in 91 SCI-E subject categories. The top 20 productive countries and institutes were analyzed herein, where 11 key papers in translational medical research and research foci were identified. Research outputs descriptors have suggested that the presence of a solid development in translational medical research, where research in this field has mainly focused on experimental medicine, general internal medicine, and medical laboratory technologies. All these outcomes have been concentrated in several journals such as Translational Research, Translational Oncology, Translational Stroke Research, and Translational Neuroscience. G7 countries make up the leading nations for translational medical research, where the center is located in USA. American institutions have made great advances in paper productions, citations, and cooperation, with overall great strengths and good development prospects. Moreover, the evolution pathway of translational medical research has been summarized as bellows: problems emerged, causes analyzed, challenges faced and solutions proposed, translational medical research programs been formally established, theoretical and applied research, all of which was in full swing. During this process, neoplasms and genomics, interdisciplinary communication between academic medical centers/institutes, drug design and development, cardiovascular and brain diseases, and even biomedical research have been identified as mainstream topics in translational medical research fields.

Keywords

Translational medical research Scientometric Research trend Web of science PubMed Knowledge mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71173249: Research on Formation Mechanism and Evolution Laws of Knowledge Networks). The authors are grateful to Hong Cui, Hong-xun Song, Bin Zhang and Nathan D. Bobai for their helpful discussion and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Arunachalam, S., & Doss, M. J. (2000). Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Current Science, 79, 621–628.Google Scholar
  2. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brander, C., Ferrone, S., & Marincola, F. M. (2006). Rewarding patient-directed research: Excellence in Translational Medicine Award. Journal of Translational Medicine, 4, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campanario, J. M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: A wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, K. H., & Guan, J. C. (2011). A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, W., Chen, S., Qi, D. C., Gao, X. Y., & Wee, A. T. S. (2007). Surface transfer p-type doping of epitaxial graphene. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129, 10418–10422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow, L. W. (2010). Gene expression profiles as an additional tool to conventional predictive factors to assist in management of early endocrine responsive breast cancer. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 19(Suppl 1), S13–S17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1382–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G., Ntzani, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2003). Translation of highly promising basic science research into clinical applications. America Journal Medina, 114, 477–484.Google Scholar
  10. Damani, S. B., & Topol, E. J. (2011). Emerging clinical applications in cardiovascular pharmacogenomics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Systems Biology and Medicine, 3, 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debucquoy, A., Machiels, J. P., McBride, W. H., & Haustermans, K. (2010). Integration of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with preoperative chemoradiation. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 16, 2709–2714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dillon, D. A., Howe, C. L., Bosari, S., & Costa, J. (1998). The molecular biology of breast cancer: Accelerating clinical applications. Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, 9, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dougherty, D., & Conway, P. H. (2008). The “3T’s” road map to transform US health care: The “how” of high-quality care. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 2319–2321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drolet, B. C., & Lorenzi, N. M. (2011). Translational research: Understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. Translational Research: The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 157, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Editor. (1968). Phagocytes and the “bench-bedside interface”. New England Journal of Medicine, 278, 1014–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enachescu, C., & Postelnicu, T. (2003). Patterns in journal citation data revealed by exploratory multivariate analysis. Scientometrics, 56, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faba-Perez, C., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & De Moya-Anegon, F. (2003). Data mining in a closed Web environment. Scientometrics, 58, 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feuerstein, G. Z., & Chavez, J. (2009). Translational medicine for stroke drug discovery: The pharmaceutical industry perspective. Stroke, 40, S121–S125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FitzGerald, G. A. (2010). Perestroika in pharma: Evolution or revolution in drug development? The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York, 77, 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freemantle, N., Cleland, J., Young, P., Mason, J., & Harrison, J. (1999). beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: Systematic review and metal regression analysis. BMJ, 318, 1730–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia, D., Hopewell, J., Liebman, A. K., & Mountain, K. (2012). The migrant clinicians network: Connecting practice to need and patients to care. Journal of Agromedicine, 17, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garfield, E. (1990). KeyWords PlusTM: ISIS breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current-contents on diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.Google Scholar
  23. Geraghty, J. (1996). Adenomatous polyposis coli and translational medicine. Lancet, 348, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goetsch, L., & Caussanel, V. (2010). Selection criteria for c-Met-targeted therapies: Emerging evidence for biomarkers. Biomarkers in Medicine, 4, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gotlib, J., Cools, J., Malone, J. M, 3rd, Schrier, S. L., Gilliland, D. G., & Coutre, S. E. (2004). The FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha fusion tyrosine kinase in hypereosinophilic syndrome and chronic eosinophilic leukemia: Implications for diagnosis, classification, and management. Blood, 103, 2879–2891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoos, A., & Cordon-Cardo, C. (2001). Tissue microarray profiling of cancer specimens and cell lines: Opportunities and limitations. Laboratory Investigation; a Journal of Technical Methods and Pathology, 81, 1331–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lakhani, S. R. (2001). Molecular genetics of solid tumours: Translating research into clinical practice. What we could do now: breast cancer. Molecular Pathology: MP, 54, 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, L. L., Ding, G. H., Feng, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2009). Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lou, Y. C., & Lin, H. F. (2012). Estimate of global research trends and performance in family therapy in Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 90, 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu, T. Y., & Yang, L. (2011). Uses of cardiomyocytes generated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem cell Research & Therapy, 2, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucio-Arias, D. (2007). A validation study of HistCite (TM): Using the discoveries of fullerenes and nanotubes. (Vols. I, II, pp. 886–887).Google Scholar
  32. Marincola, F. M. (2003). Translational Medicine: A two-way road. Journal of Translational Medicine, 1, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McBride, P., Schrott, H. G., Plane, M. B., Underbakke, G., & Brown, R. L. (1998). Primary care practice adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for patients with coronary heart disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1238–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mielke, M. M., & Lyketsos, C. G. (2010). Alterations of the sphingolipid pathway in Alzheimer’s disease: New biomarkers and treatment targets? Neuromolecular Medicine, 12, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norman, C. D., Charnaw-Burger, J., Yip, A. L., Saad, S., & Lombardo, C. (2010). Designing health innovation networks using complexity science and systems thinking: The CoNEKTR model. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 1016–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porter, A., Fischer, M. J., Brooks, D., Bruce, M., Charleston, J., Cleveland, W. H., et al. (2012). Quality of life and psychosocial factors in African Americans with hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Translational Research: The Journal of laboratory and clinical Medicine, 159, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2011). Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World. Scientometrics, 86, 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Psyrri, A., Licitra, L., Lacombe, D., Schuuring, E., Budach, W., Ozsahin, M., et al. (2010). Strategies to promote translational research within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Head and Neck Cancer Group: A report from the Translational Research Subcommittee. Annals of Oncology, 21, 1952–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. PubMed Help (2005). [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2005. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3830/.
  40. Rigby, M. R. (2010). The role of the physician-scientist in bridging basic and clinical research in type 1 diabetes. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Obesity, 17, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rost, K., Nutting, P. A., Smith, J., & Werner, J. J. (2000). Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to improve the quality and outcome of care for major depression. General Hospital Psychiatry, 22, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rubio, D. M., Schoenbaum, E. E., Lee, L. S., Schteingart, D. E., Marantz, P. R., Anderson, K. E., et al. (2010). Defining translational research: Implications for training. Academic Medicine, 85, 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Runyan, C. M., & Taylor, J. A. (2010). Clinical applications of stem cells in craniofacial surgery. Facial plastic Surgery: FPS, 26, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suk, F. M., Lien, G. S., Yu, T. C., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Global trends in Helicobacter pylori research from 1991 to 2008 analyzed with the Science Citation Index Expanded. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 23, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, L., & Pan, Y.-T. (2010). Research frontiers and trends in graphene research. New Carbon Materials, 25, 401–408.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, C. D., & Wang, Z. (1998). Evaluation of the models for Bradford’s law. Scientometrics, 42, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westfall, J. M., Mold, J., & Fagnan, L. (2007). Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 403–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 211–213.Google Scholar
  50. Zerhouni, E. A. (2005). Translational and clinical science—time for a new vision. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 1621–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information ManagementWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations