Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 831–857 | Cite as

Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records

  • Clément Bosquet
  • Pierre-Philippe CombesEmail author
Article

Abstract

Thanks to a unique individual dataset of French academics in economics, we explain individual publication and citation records by gender and age, co-authorship patterns (average number of authors per article and size of the co-author network) and specialisation choices (percentage of output in each JEL code). The analysis is performed on both EconLit publication scores (adjusted for journal quality) and Google Scholar citation indexes, which allows us to present a broad picture of knowledge diffusion in economics. Citations are largely driven by publication records, which means that these two measures are partly substitutes, but citations are also substantially increased by larger research team size and co-author networks.

Keywords

Economics of science Productivity determinants Knowledge diffusion Publication scores Citation indexes 

Mathematics Subject Classification

62P20 62P25 

JEL Classification

J24 O31 J45 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Philippe Donnay and Charles Laitong for their excellent research assistance.

References

  1. Abramo, G., d’Angelo, C. A., & di Costa, F. (2010). Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable? Scientometrics, 84(3), 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2012). Counting citations in the field of business and management: Why use google scholar rather than the web of science. Scientometrics, 93(3), 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2013). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: The case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41–55.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Combes, P.-P., & Linnemer, L. (2010). Inferring missing citations. A quantitative multi-criteria ranking of all journals in economics. GREQAM Working Paper (2010-25).Google Scholar
  6. Combes, P.-P., Linnemer, L., & Visser, M. (2008). Publish or peer-rich? The role of skills and networks in hiring economics professors. Labour Economics, 15(3), 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond, A. M. (1986). What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21(2), 200–215.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egghe, L., Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2013). Measuring co-authors’ contribution to an article’s visibility. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0832-4.
  10. Hamermesh, D. S., Johnson, G. E., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1982). Scholarship, citations and salaries: Economic rewards in economics. Southern Economic Journal, 49(2), 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, W. L., Weisbrod, B. A., & Strauss, R. P. (1978). Modeling the earnings and research productivity of academic economists. Journal of Political Economy, 86(41), 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harzing, A.-W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of nobel prize winners. Scientometrics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  13. Hirsh, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz, D. A. (1973). Faculty salaries, rates of promotion and productivity at a large university. American Economic Review, 63(3), 469–477.Google Scholar
  15. Kenny, L. W., & Studley, R. E. (1995). Economists’ salaries and lifetime productivity. Southern Economic Journal, 62(2), 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lovell, M. C. (1973). The production of economic literature: An interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature, 11(1), 27–55.Google Scholar
  17. McDowell, J. M., & Smith, J. K. (1992). The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: Implication for academic promotion. Economic Inquiry, 30(1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2013). Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sauer, R. D. (1988). Estimates of the returns to quality and coauthorship in economic academia. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 855–866.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schreiber, M. (2008). To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts. New Journal of Physics, 10(4), 040201-1–040201-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stigler, G. J., & Friedland, C. (1975). The citation practices of doctorates in economics. Journal of Political Economy, 83(3), 477–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Arensbergen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zinovyevay, N., & Bagues, M. (2012). It’s not what you know, but who you know: The role of connections in academic promotions. IZA Working Paper 6821.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political Science (SERC), Aix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics)LondonUK
  2. 2.Aix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), CNRS & EHESS, Center for Economic Policy ResearchMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations