, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 519–533 | Cite as

Evaluating top faculty researchers and the incentives that motivate them

  • J. Corey Miller
  • Keith H. Coble
  • Jayson L. Lusk


We survey tenure-track faculty members employed in three fields in colleges of agriculture at land-grant universities—agricultural economics, agronomy, and food science—to evaluate the effects of different employment structures and incentives on research productivity. These evaluations include conducting statistical tests to assess any effects of different academic appointments and developing a regression model to measure the effects of these and other attributes on individual research productivity, as defined by the number of publications in the Thomson ISI Web of Science. We find faculty who hold larger teaching and extension appointments produce fewer publications; we also find positive effects on the number of publications for grants and university funding, multi-institutional research collaboration, and number of graduate students advised.


Research productivity Publications Science citation index 

Supplementary material

11192_2013_987_MOESM1_ESM.docx (212 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 212 kb)


  1. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2009). Assessing technical and cost efficiency of research activities: A case study of the Italian university system. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2012). Counting citations in the field of business and management: Why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J. (2001). Human capital and growth. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairweather, J. S. (1999). The highly productive faculty member: Confronting the mythologies of faculty work. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty productivity: Facts, fictions, and issues (pp. 55–98). New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fenker, R. M. (1977). The incentive structure of a university. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(4), 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foltz, J. D., & Barham, B. L. (2009). The productivity effects of extension appointments in land-grant colleges. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(4), 712–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Gorraiz, J., Greil, M., Mayer, W., Reimann, R., & Schiebel, E. (2009). International publication output and research impact in social sciences: Comparison of the Universities of Vienna, Zurich, and Oslo. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilmer, C. E., & Hilmer, M. J. (2005). How do journal quality, co-authorship, and author order affect agricultural economists’ salaries? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Konrad, A. M., & Pfeffer, J. (1990). Do you get what you deserve? Factors affecting the relationship between productivity and pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 258–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Long, R., Crawford, A., White, M., & Davis, K. (2009). Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation. Scientometrics, 78(2), 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Meara, K. A. (2006). Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Influence of faculty work life. Planning for Higher Education, 34(2), 43–53.Google Scholar
  17. Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39, 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porter, S. R., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006). Institutional research productivity and the connection to average student quality and overall reputation. Economics of Education Review, 25, 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smart, J. C. (1978). Diversity of academic organizations: Faculty incentives. The Journal of Higher Education, 49(5), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., & Hollis, P. R. (2003). Using publication counts to measure an institution’s research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Corey Miller
    • 1
  • Keith H. Coble
    • 1
  • Jayson L. Lusk
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations