Author name disambiguation in scientific collaboration and mobility cases
Scientists generally do scientific collaborations with one another and sometimes change their affiliations, which leads to scientific mobility. This paper proposes a recursive reinforced name disambiguation method that integrates both coauthorship and affiliation information, especially in cases of scientific collaboration and mobility. The proposed method is evaluated using the dataset from the Thomson Reuters Scientific “Web of Science”. The probability of recall and precision of the algorithm are then analyzed. To understand the effect of the name ambiguation on the h-index and g-index before and after the name disambiguation, calculations of their distribution are also presented. Evaluation experiments show that using only the affiliation information in the name disambiguation achieves better performance than that using only the coauthorship information; however, our proposed method that integrates both the coauthorship and affiliation information can control the bias in the name ambiguation to a higher extent.
KeywordsAuthor disambiguation Scientific collaboration Scientific mobility Coauthorship Affiliation
- Badar, K., Hite, J., & Badir, Y. (2012). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 1–21, doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0764-z.
- Chung, C., & Park, H. (2012). Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals. Scientometrics, 1–9, doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0707-8.
- Huang, J., Ertekin, S., & Giles, C. (2006). Efficient name disambiguation for large-scale databases. Knowledge Discovery in Databases, PKDD, 2006(4213), 536–544.Google Scholar
- Onodera, N., Iwasawa, M., Midorikawa, N., Yoshikane, F., Amano, K., Ootani, Y., et al. (2011). A method for eliminating articles by homonymous authors from the large number of articles retrieved by author search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar