Journal clustering of library and information science for subfield delineation using the bibliometric analysis toolkit: CATAR
- 1.3k Downloads
A series of techniques based on bibliometric clustering and mapping for scientometrics analysis was implemented in a software toolkit called CATAR for free use. Application of the toolkit to the field of library and information science (LIS) based on journal clustering for subfield identification and analysis to suggest a proper set of LIS journals for research evaluation is described. Two sets of data from Web of Science in the Information Science & Library Science (IS&LS) subject category of Journal Citation Reports were analyzed: one ranges from year 2000 to 2004, the other from 2005 to 2009. The clustering results in graphic dendrograms and multi-dimensional scaling maps from both datasets consistently show that some IS&LS journals clustered in the management information systems subfield are distant from the other journals in terms of their intellectual base. Additionally, the cluster characteristics analyzed based on a diversity index reveals the regional characteristics for some identified subfields. Since journal classification has become a high-stake issue that affects the evaluation of scholars and universities in some East Asian countries, both cases (isolation in intellectual base and regionalism in national interest) should be taken into consideration when developing research evaluation in LIS based on journal classification and ranking for the evaluation to be fairly implemented without biasing future LIS research.
KeywordsDocument clustering Bibliographic coupling Journal classification Research performance evaluation Freeware
This work is supported in part by the “Aim for the Top University Project” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, ROC. This work is also supported in part by the National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan under the Grant NSC 100-2511-S-003-053-MY2. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
- Åström, F. (2002). Visualizing library and information science concept spaces through keyword and citation based maps and clusters. In H. Bruce, R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), The fourth international conference on conceptions of library and information science (CoLIS4) University of Washington, Seattle, WA, July 21–25 2002 (pp. 185–197). Greenwood Village: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
- Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. Visualizing knowledge domains. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science & technology (ARIST), 2003 (vol. 37, pp. 179–255). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review, 54(5), 761.Google Scholar
- Kleiweg, P. (2008). Software for dialectometrics and cartography. Retrieved December 31, 2008 from http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/L04/.
- Kruskal, J. B. (1997). Multidimensional scaling and other methods for discovering structure. In K. Enslein, A. Ralston, & H. S. Wilf (Eds.), Statistical methods for digital computers (pp. 296–339). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden: DSWO.Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Moya-Anegon, F., Herrero-Solana, V., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (2006). A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: the SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library science research and information. Journal of Information Science, 32(1), 63–77. doi: 10.1177/0165551506059226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ni, C., & Ding, Y. (2010). Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem (vol. 47). Pittsburgh, PA, USA.Google Scholar
- Ni, C., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Four-facets study of scholarly communities: Artifact, producer, concept, and gatekeeper. In A. Grove (Ed.), Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, October 9–12, 2011 (vol. 48).Google Scholar
- Ni, C., Sugimoto, C., & Cronin, B. (2012). Visualizing and comparing four facets of scholarly communication: producers, artifacts, concepts, and gatekeepers. Scientometrics, 1–13, doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0849-8.
- Nisonger, T. E., & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl–Davis study. College & Research Libraries, 66(4), 341–377.Google Scholar
- Nooy, W. D., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2012). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (structural analysis in the social sciences (no. 34)).Google Scholar
- Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999a). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115:aid-asi3>3.0.co;2-j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Persson, O. (2009). BibExcel. Inforsk, Umeå Univ, Sweden. http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/. Accessed 25 Oct 2012.
- Salton, G. (1989). Automatic text processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Sci2 Team. (2009). Science of Science (Sci2) Tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. Retrieved August 12, 2008 from https://sci2.cns.iu.edu.
- Tseng, Y.-H. (1998). Multilingual keyword extraction for term suggestion. In 21st International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval—SIGIR ‘98, Australia, Aug. 24–28 1998 (pp. 377–378).Google Scholar
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). VOSviewer. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) of Leiden University. http://www.vosviewer.com/. Accessed 03 Oct 2012.
- van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2012). Multiple perspectives on bibliometric data: Combining different science mapping approaches using VOSviewer. In Paper presented at the 2nd Global TechMining conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, September 5. Google Scholar
- van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information retrieval. Retrieved October 25, 2009 from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith/Chapter.2/Table_2.1.html.
- White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology (ARIST), 32, 99–168.Google Scholar
- White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327:aid-asi4>3.0.co;2-4.Google Scholar
- Yan, E. J., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326. doi: 10.1002/asi.22680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar