Scientometrics

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 1071–1094

Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: a bibliometric study (1974–2011)

  • María Pinto
  • María Isabel Escalona-Fernández
  • Antonio Pulgarín
Article

Abstract

We examine the international scientific productivity on information literacy since its inception in 1974 until late 2011, based on a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles included in the web of science and Scopus databases. The sample comprised two macro-domains—the most productive and the least productive. The former was the area of social sciences (SoS), covering such disciplines as information and documentation, communication, education, management, etc. The latter was the area of health sciences (HeS), covering such disciplines as medicine, nursing, etc. The objective of the study was to analyse the evolution of research activity during this period, taking into account the authors’ production, the distribution and co-authorship of the works, the affiliation, and the most frequently used journals. A quantitative and qualitative methodological approach was taken, based on statistical, mathematical, and content analyses. The results showed exponential growth of the scientific publications in both domains (R2 = 0.9544 for SoS, and R2 = 0.9393 for HeS), with a predominance of Anglo-Saxon authors. Author productivity was low (1.29 and 1.12 papers/author), while the dispersion of articles by journal averaged 4.96 in SoS and 1.86 in HeS. Scientific collaboration exceeded 53 % in the SoS domain and 69 % in HeS. There was a major dispersion of the places of the authors’ affiliation. In both domains, the author distributions fitted Lotka’s law, and the journal distributions Bradford’s Law.

Keywords

Information literacy Bibliometric analysis Scientific production Social sciences Health sciences 

References

  1. ALA (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential. Accessed Jan 2012.
  2. ALA (1998). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency. Accessed Jan 2012.
  3. ALA/ACRL (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf. Accessed May 2012.
  4. Andretta, S. (2007). Phenomenography: A conceptual framework for information literacy education. Aslib Proceedings, 59(2), 152–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, Ch A. (1997). Information skills for an electronic world: Training doctoral research students. Journal of Information Science, 23(3), 225–238.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basili, C. (2003). Information Literacy in Europe: A first insight into the state of the art of information literacy in the European Union. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar
  7. Basili, C. (2004). EnIL survey. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. http://www.ceris.cnr.it/Basili/EnIL/questionnaire.html. Accessed Nov 2009.
  8. Basili, C. (Ed.). (2008). Information Literacy at the cross-road of Education and Information Policies in Europe. Rome: CNR.Google Scholar
  9. Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College and Research Libraries, 55(4), 309–322.Google Scholar
  10. Benito, F. (1996). Del dominio de la información a la mejora de la inteligencia. Diseño, aplicación y evaluación del programa HEBORI (habilidades y estrategias para buscar, organizar y razonar la información). Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
  11. Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentation. London: C. Lockwood.Google Scholar
  12. Breivik, P. S. (1985). Putting libraries back in the information society. American Libraries, 6 (1), 723.Google Scholar
  13. Bruce, C. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bundy, A. (1998). Information literacy: The key competency for the 21st century. Paper presented at the annual conference of the international association of technological university libraries held in Pretoria, South Africa. http://www.iatul.org/doclibrary/public/Conf_Proceedings/1998/INFORMATIONLITERACYBundy.doc. Accessed May 2012.
  15. Burchinal, L. G. (1976). The communication revolution: America’s third century challenge. In The future of organizing knowledge: Papers presented at the Texas A & M University Libraries Centennial Academic Assembly, September 24, 1976 (p. 11). College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Libraries.Google Scholar
  16. Calderón, A. (2010). Informe APEI sobre alfabetización informacional. Gijón: Asociación Profesional de Especialistas en Información. http://eprints.rclis.org/bitstream/10760/14972/1/Informeapeialfin.pdf. Accessed Oct 2012.
  17. Calzada, J., & Marzal, M. A. (2007). 15 años de Alfabetización en Información: Investigación internacional recogida en LISA, ERIC y SSCI entre 1990 y 2005. Boletín de la Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios, 22(86–87), 15–27.Google Scholar
  18. Candy, P. C. (2002). Information literacy and lifelong learning. White paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy, Meetings of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic, July 2002.Google Scholar
  19. Catts, R. (2005a). Information literacies and lifelong learning: Keynote address. Motesplats Infor Framtiden. (Swedish Library Association Annual Conference). Boras, Sweden.Google Scholar
  20. Catts, R. (2005b). Information Skills Survey, Technical Manual. Published by Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL).Google Scholar
  21. Catts, R. (2007). Information competencies: Necessary skills for lifelong learning in every profession. In IVIG annual conference, Prague.Google Scholar
  22. Catts, R., & Lau, J. (2008). Towards information literacy indicators. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/wp08_InfoLit_en.pdf. Accessed May 2012.
  23. CAUL. Council of Australian University Librarians (2001). Information literacy standards developed by the Council of Australian University Librarians. http://archive.caul.edu.au/caul-doc/InfoLitStandards2001.doc. Accessed May 2012.
  24. Cheuk, B. (2002). Information literacy in the workplace context: Issues, best practices and challenge. White paper for use at the information literacy meeting of experts, Prague, The Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  25. Clark, C., & Catts, R. (2007). Information skills survey: Its application to a medical course. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2(3), 3–26.Google Scholar
  26. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Corrall, S. M. (2007). Benchmarking strategic engagement with information literacy in higher education: towards a working model. Information Research, 12(4) paper 328. http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper328.html. Accessed May 2012.
  28. Cortés, J., & Lau, J. (1999). Information skills for life-long learning (Habilidades informativas para el aprendizaje de toda la vida). In 65th IFLA council and general conference, Bangkok, Thailand, August, 20–27.Google Scholar
  29. Cortés, J., & Lau, J. (2000). Desarrollo de Habilidades Informativas en Instituciones de Educación Superior. México: UACJ.Google Scholar
  30. Cortés, J., & Lau, J. (2004). Normas de alfabetización informativa para el aprendizaje. México: UACJ. http://bivir.uacj.mx/dhi/PublicacionesUACJ/Docs/Libros/Memorias_Tercer_Encuentro_DHI.pdf. Accessed Oct 2012.
  31. Cuevas, A. (2007). Lectura, alfabetización en información y biblioteca escolar. Gijón: Ediciones TREA.Google Scholar
  32. Davenport, T. (1997). Information ecology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Doyle, C. (1996). Information Literacy: status report from the United States. In: Booker D. (Ed.), Learning for life: information literacy and the autonomous learner: proceedings of the second National Information Literacy Conference conducted by the University of South Australia Library, 30 November–1 December, 1995 (pp. 39-49). Adelaide: University of South Australia Library.Google Scholar
  34. Dudziak, E. A. (2003) Information Literacy: princípios, filosofia e prática. Ciência da Informaçãovol, 32(1), 23–35. http://eprints.rclis.org/4727/1/DUDZIAKCi.Inf-2004-156.pdf. Accessed Sept 2012.
  35. Dudziak, E. A. (2007). Information literacy and lifelong learning in Latin America: The challenge to build social sustainability. Information Development, 23(1), 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dudziak, E. A. (2008). Os faróis da sociedade de informação: Uma análise crítica sobre a situação da competência em informação no Brasil. Informação & Sociedade, 18(2), 41–53.Google Scholar
  37. Dudziak, E. A. (2010). Competência informacional: análise evolucionária das tendências da pesquisa e produtividade científica em âmbito mundial. Informação & Informação, 15(2), 1–22. http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/7045/6994. Accessed May 2012.
  38. Dunn, K. (2002). Assessing information literacy skills in the California state university: A progress report. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1/2), 26–35.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Egghe, L. (1986). The dual of Bradford’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(4), 246–255.Google Scholar
  40. Eisenberg, M., & Berkowitz, R. E. (2000). Teaching information and technology skills: The Big6 in secondary schools. Worthington, OH: Linworth Pub.Google Scholar
  41. Escalona, M. I., Lagar, P., & Pulgarín, A. (2010). Web of Science vs. SCOPUS: Un estudio cuantitativo en Ingeniería Química. Anales de Documentación, 13, 159–175.Google Scholar
  42. Fernández, M. (2008). Metodología para el desarrollo y aplicación del Programa de alfabetización informacional en las bibliotecas y centros de información en ciencias de la salud. Acimed, 18(5). http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/aci/v18n5/aci091108.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
  43. Ferreira, S. (1995). Novos paradigmas da informação e novas percepções do usuário. Ciência da Informação, 25, 2.Google Scholar
  44. Gómez, J. A., Licea, J., & Rodriguez, J. V. (2004). Information literacy: Implications for Mexican and Spanish university students. Library Review, 53(9), 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gómez, J. A., & Pasadas, C. (2003). Information Literacy developments and issues in Spain. Library Review, 57(7), 340–348.Google Scholar
  46. Grassian, E., & Clark, S. (1999). Internet resources: Information literacy sites: Background and ideas for program planning and development. College & Research Libraries News, 60(2), 78–92.Google Scholar
  47. Gratch-Lindauer, B. (2002). Comparing the regional accreditation standards: Outcomes assessment and other trends. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1–2), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gratch-Lindauer, B. (2003). Selecting and developing assessment tools. In E. Fuseler (Ed.), Avery assessing student learning outcomes for information literacy instruction (pp. 22–39). Chicago: ALA.Google Scholar
  49. Gratch-Lindauer, B. (2004). Developing a tool to assess community college students. In I. Rockman (Ed.), Integrating information literacy into the higher education curriculum (pp. 165–206). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Gratch-Lindauer, B. (2005). Information literacy student behaviors: Potential items for the national survey of student engagement. College & Research Libraries News, 66(10), 715–718.Google Scholar
  51. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2007). Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety. Library & Information Science Research, 29, 332–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamelink, C. (1976). An alternative to news. Journal of Communication, 26(4), 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hancock, V. E. (2004). Information literacy for lifelong learning. http://www.libraryinstruction.com/information-literacy.html. Accessed Nov 2008.
  54. Hernández, P. (2012). Tendencias de la Alfabetización Informativa en Iberoamérica. México: CUIB. http://132.248.242.3/~publica/archivos/libros/tendencias_alfabetizacion_informativa.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2012.
  55. Herring, J. E. (1999). Exploiting the Internet as an information resource. London: Library Association.Google Scholar
  56. Horton, F. W. (2007). Understanding information literacy: A primer. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Communication/Documents/157020E.pdf. Accessed May 2012.
  57. Jehlik, T. (2004). Information literacy in the public library. NLA Nebraska Library Association Quarterly 35(4). http://www.webcitation.org/5NrA49sQl (Accessed: May 2012).
  58. Johnson, W. (2008). The application of learning theory to information literacy. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 14(4), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Johnston, J. (1985). Information literacy: Academic skills for a new age. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  60. Julien, H. E. (2000). Information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries: Longitudinal trends and international comparisons. College & Research Libraries, 61(6), 510–523.Google Scholar
  61. Julien, H. E. (2005). Education for information literacy: A global perspective. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 46(3), 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Julien, H. E., & Breu, R. D. (2005). Instructional practices in Canadian public libraries. Library and information. Science Research, 27(3), 281–301.Google Scholar
  63. Kapitzke, C. (2003). Information literacy: A positivist epistemology and a politics of out formation. Educational Theory, 53(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kellner, D. (2000). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogies: New paradigms. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary pedagogies: cultural politics, instituting education, and the discourse of theory (pp. 2–196). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Kuhlthau, C. (1985). A process approach to library skills instruction. School Library Media Quarterly, 13(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
  66. Kuhlthau, C. (1990). Information skills for an information society: A review of research. Information Reports and Bibliographies, 19(3), 14–26.Google Scholar
  67. Kuhlthau, C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
  69. Kuhlthau, C. (2004). Seeking meaning (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  70. Kurbanoglu, S. S., Akkoyunlu, B., & Umay, A. A. (2006). Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 730–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lau, J. (2006). Guidelines on information literacy for lifelong learning. S.l.: IFLA. http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s42/pub/IL-Guidelines2006.pdf. Accessed May 2012.
  72. Lau, J. (2007). Information literacy: An international state-of-the art report. UNESCO-IFLA. http://www.uv.mx/usbi_ver/unesco. Accessed Oct 2009.
  73. Lecardelli, J., & Schoffen, N. S. (2006). Competência informacional no Brasil: um estudo bibliográfico no período de 2001 a 2005. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, 2(2), 21–46. http://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/%20view/16/4. Accessed Oct 2012.
  74. Licea de Arenas, J. (2009). La alfabetización informacional en el entorno hispanoamericano. Anales de Documentación, 12, 93–106.Google Scholar
  75. Limberg, L. (2005). Informing information literacy education through empirical research. In J. Henri & M. Asselin (Eds.), The information literate school community: issues of leadership (pp. 39–50). Wagga, Australia: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  76. Lloyd, A. M. (2006). Information literacy landscapes: An emerging picture. Journal of Documentation, 62(5), 570–583.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.Google Scholar
  78. Lupton, M. (2004). The learning connection: Information literacy and the student experience. Adelaide: Auslib Press.Google Scholar
  79. Marcun, J. W. (2002). Rethinking information literacy. Library Quarterly, 72(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Markless, S., & Streatfield, D. R. (2007). Three decades of information literacy: Redefining the parameters. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and challenge: Information literacy for the 21st century (pp. 15–36). Adelaide: Auslib Press.Google Scholar
  81. Meneses, G. (2009). Evolución y estado actual de la alfabetización en información en Cuba. Acimed, 19, 5. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/aci/v19n5/aci06509.pdf. Accessed Oct 2012.
  82. Meneses, G., & Pinto, M. (2011). ALFINEV. Modelo para la evaluación de la alfabetización informacional en la Educación Superior en Cuba. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 25(55), 81–106.Google Scholar
  83. Newell, T. S. (2010). Learning in simulations: Examining the effectiveness of information literacy instruction using middle school students’ portfolio products. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 5(3), 20–38.Google Scholar
  84. Nicholls, P. T. (1986). Empirical validation of Lotka’s law. Information Processing and Management, 22(5), 417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Oakleaf, M. J. (2006). Assessing information literacy skills: A rubric approach. Ph.D. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  86. Oakleaf, M., & Kaske, N. (2009). Guiding questions for assessing information literacy in higher education. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. O’Connor, L. G., Radcliff, C. J., & Gedeon, J. A. (2002). Applying systems design and item response theory to the problem of measuring information literacy skills. College and Research Libraries, 63(6), 528–543.Google Scholar
  88. Ortoll E. (2004). La competencia informacional en las ciencias de la salud. Una visión desde las universidades españolas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 27(2), 221–241.Google Scholar
  89. Owens, (1976). State, government and libraries. Library Journal, 101(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  90. Owusu-Ansah, E. K. (2004). Information literacy and higher education: Placing the academic library in the center of a comprehensive solution. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pao, M. L. (1985). Lotka’s law: A testing procedure. Information Processing and Management, 21(4), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Partridge, H., Lee, J., & Munro, C. (2010). Becoming “librarian 2.0”: The skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a web 2.0 world (and beyond). Library Trends, 59(1), 315.Google Scholar
  93. Pawley, C. (2003). Information literacy: A contradictory coupling. Library Quarterly, 73(4), 422–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pierce, S. T. (2000). Readiness for evidence-based practice: Information literacy needs of nursing faculty and students in a southern US state. EdD dissertation, Northwestern State, University of Louisiana.Google Scholar
  95. Pinto, M. (2010). Design of the IL-HUMASS survey on information literacy in higher education: A self-assessment approach. Journal of Information Science, 36(1), 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pinto, M. (2011). An approach to the internal facet of information literacy using the IL-HUMASS survey. Journal of Academic Library, 37(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pinto, M., Cordón, J. A., & Gómez, R. (2010a). Thirty years of information literacy (1977–2007): A terminological, conceptual and statistical analysis. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (JOLIS), 42(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pinto, M., & Garcia, J. (2006). La enseñanza-aprendizaje de las competencias genéricas en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: El proyecto ALFINEES. I Jornadas de Innovación Docente, tecnologías de la información y la comunicación e investigación educativa, Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
  99. Pinto, M., Garcia, J., Sales, D., & Cordón, J. A. (2010b). Interactive self-assessment test for improving and evaluating information competence. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 526–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Pinto, M., & Sales, D. (2007a). A case study research for user-centered information literacy instruction: Information behavior of translation trainees. Journal of Information Science, 33(5), 531–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pinto, M., & Sales, D. (2007b). Informe sobre alfabetización informacional en España, 2006. In: J. Lau (coord.), State-of-the-art of information literacy. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  102. Pinto, M., & Sales, D. (2008a). Knowledge transfer and information skills for student-centered learning: Some academic experiences in Spain. Portal. Libraries and the Academy, 8(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pinto, M., & Sales, D. (2008b). InfoliTrans: A model for the development of information competence for translators. Journal of Documentation, 64(3), 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pinto, M., Uribe-Tirado, A., Cordón, J. A., & Gómez Díaz, R. (2011). La producción científica internacional sobre competencias informacionales e informáticas: Tendencias e interrelaciones. Información, Cultura y Sociedad. Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas-Argentina, 25, 29–62.Google Scholar
  105. Ponjuán, G. (2010). Guiding principles for the preparation of a national information literacy program. The International Information & Library Review, 42(2), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Purdue, J. (2003). Stories, not information: Transforming information literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(4), 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Quindemil, E. (2008). Políticas de información y su incidencia en la alfabetización informacional. Consideraciones desde la perspectiva cubana. Bibliotecas Anales de Investigación, 4, 28–35.Google Scholar
  108. Rader, H. B. (2000). A silver anniversary: 25 years of reviewing the literature related to user instruction. Reference Services Review, 28(3), 290–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rader, H. B. (2002). Information literacy 1973–2002: A selected literature review bibliography. Library Trends, 51(2), 141–143.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  110. Sánchez, M. (2010). Competencias Informacionales en las Biociencias: Existencia en el ámbito universitario cubano. Congreso INFO 2010-Cuba. http://alfiniberoamerica.wikispaces.com/Cuba. Accessed May 2012.
  111. Sánchez Ambriz, G. (2007). Experiencia de aplicación de servicios de alfabetización informacional para docentes universitarios mayores de 35 años en la UNAM-México. Anales de Documentación, 10, 375–396. http://revistas.um.es/analesdoc/article/view/1261. Accessed Sept 2012.
  112. Saunders, L. (2007). Teaching information literacy to social sciences students and practitioners: A casebook of applications (book review). Library & Information Science Research, 29(4), 579–581.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. SCONUL-Society of College, National and University Libraries (1999). Information skills in Higher Education: A SCONUL position paper. http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/papers/Seven_pillars.html. Accessed May 2012.
  114. Shenton, A. K., & Dixon, P. (2004). Issues arising from youngsters’ information-seeking behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 26(2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Shenton, A. K., & Fitzgibbons, M. (2010). Making information literacy relevant. Library Review, 59(3), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Snavely, L., & Cooper, N. (1997). Competing agendas in higher education: Finding a place for information literacy. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 37(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  117. Somerville, M. M., & Collins, L. (2008). Collaborative design: A learner-centered library planning approach. Electronic Library, 26(6), 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sontag, G., & Meulemans, Y. (2003). Planning for Assessment. In E. Fuseler (Ed.), Assessing student learning outcomes for information literacy instruction (pp. 6–21). Chicago: ALA.Google Scholar
  119. Spitzer, K. L., Eisenberg, M., & Lowe, C. A. (1998). Information literacy essential skills for the information age. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED427780.pdf. Accessed May 2012.
  120. Swanson, T. (2004). Implementing a critical information literacy model. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(2), 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Taylor, R. S. (1979). Reminiscing about the future. Library Journal, 104, 1895–1901.Google Scholar
  122. Uribe, A. (2010). La Alfabetización Informacional en la Universidad. Descripción y Categorización según los Niveles de Integración de ALFIN. Caso Universidad de Antioquia. Revista Internamericana de Bibliotecología, 33(1), 31–83.Google Scholar
  123. Virkus, S. (2003). Information literacy in Europe: A literature review. Information Research, 8(4), 159.Google Scholar
  124. Ward, D. (2006). Revisioning information literacy for lifelong meaning. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science, 26(6), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2005). Information literacy in the curriculum: selected findings from a phenomenographic study of UK conceptions of, and pedagogy for, information literacy. In: Rust, C. (Ed.), Improving student learning: diversity and inclusivity: proceedings of the 11th ISL symposium, Birmingham, 6–8 September 2004. (pp. 212–224.). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved 20 May 2012 from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/sheila/literacy/webber-johnston-isl.pdf
  127. Zheng, Q., & Wang, Sh. (2009). Programming library 2.0 that users need. Electronic Library, 27(2), 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zurkowski, P. (1974). The information service environment: Relationships and priorities (Report ED 100391) (p. 6). Washington, D.F.: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Pinto
    • 1
  • María Isabel Escalona-Fernández
    • 2
  • Antonio Pulgarín
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication, Facultad de Comunicación y DocumentaciónUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Library, University of ExtremaduraCáceresSpain
  3. 3.Department of Information and Communication, Facultad de Biblioteconomía y DocumentaciónUniversity of ExtremaduraBadajozSpain

Personalised recommendations