Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely
In this research, we propose a method to trace scientist’s research trends realtimely. By monitoring the downloads of scientific articles in the journal of Scientometrics for 744 h, namely one month, we investigate the download statistics. Then we aggregate the keywords in these downloaded research papers, and analyze the trends of article downloading and keyword downloading. Furthermore, taking both the downloads of keywords and articles into consideration, we design a method to detect the emerging research trends. We find that in scientometrics field, social media, new indices to quantify scientific productivity (g-index), webometrics, semantic, text mining, and open access are emerging fields that scientometrics researchers are focusing on.
KeywordsResearch trend Altmetrics Springer Realtime Scientometrics Download
The research is supported by the project of “Social Science Foundation of China”(Grant No. 10CZX011), the project of “Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China” (Grant No. 2009041110001), as well as the project of “Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (Grant No. DUT12RW309).
- Arrue, J. L., & Lopez, M. V. (1991). Conservation tillage research trends and priorities. Suelo Y Planta, 1, 555–564.Google Scholar
- Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age information, infrastructure and the internet. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Ebner, M., & Reinhardt, W. (2009). Social networking in scientific conferences–twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
- Greenhow, C. (2009). Social scholarship: applying social networking technologies to research practices. Am Lib Assoc, 37, 42–47.Google Scholar
- Groth, P., & Gurney, T. (2010). Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: a chemistry blogging case study. In: Web Science Conf., 2010, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
- Kjellberg, S. (2011). I am a blogging researcher: motivations for blogging in a scholarly context. Retrieved December 21, 2011 from http://frodo.lib.uic.edu/ojsjournals/index.php/fm/article/view/2962/2580.
- Koblenz. (2011). Tracking scholarly impact on the social Web. Retrieved December 21, 2011 from http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/.
- Letierce, J., Passant, A., Decker, S., & Breslin, J.G. (2010). Understanding how twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Web Science Conf., 2010, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
- Lovink, G. (2008). Zero comments. Blogging and Critical Internet Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15.Google Scholar
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010), Alt-metrics: A manifesto, (v.1.0). Retrieved April 21, 2012 from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
- Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & BollenHow, J. (2012). How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations. CoRR abs/1202.2461. Google Scholar
- Weller, K., Dröge, E., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Citation analysis in twitter: approaches for defining and measuring information ows within tweets during scientific conferences. In: Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2011), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- Weller, K., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/references be identified and measured? In: Web Science Conf., 2011, Germany.Google Scholar