International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals
Using bibliometric methods, we investigate China’s international scientific collaboration from three levels of collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. We design a database in SQL Server, and make analysis of Chinese SCI papers based on the corresponding author field. We find that China’s international scientific collaboration is focused on a handful of countries. Nearly 95 % international co-authored papers are collaborated with only 20 countries, among which the USA account for more than 40 % of all. Results also show that Chinese lineage in the international co-authorship is obvious, which means Chinese immigrant scientists are playing an important role in China’s international scientific collaboration, especially in English-speaking countries.
KeywordsSCI Scientific collaboration Bibliometric Chinese immigrant Chinese lineage
The work was supported by the project of “Social Science Foundation of China” (10CZX011), the project of “Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China” (20090041110001), and the project of “Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (DUT12RW309).
- Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2005). China’s quantitative expansion phase: exponential growth but low impact. In: P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (eds.), ISSI 2005: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 362–370). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.Google Scholar
- Kostoff, R. N. (2009). China S&T assessment. IEEE Intell Syst, 24(4), 71–74.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2011). When can the cross-over between China and the USA be expected using Scopus data? Research Trends, (25), Retrieved Feb 15, 2012 from: http://www.researchtrends.com/issue25-november-2011/is-science-in-your-country-declining-or-is-your-country-becoming-a-scientific-super-power-and-how-quickly/.
- Shelton, R. & Foland, P. (2009). The race for world leadership of science and technology: status and forecasts. In: B. Larsen, J. Larsen (eds), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 369–380). Brazil: Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
- Wang, X. W., Liu, D., Ding, K., & Wang, X. R. (2011a). Impact of funding on research output: an empirical study on 10 countries. In: E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 848–854). South Africa: Durban.Google Scholar
- Zhou, P. (2008). China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006. ISSI Newsl, 13, 7–9.Google Scholar