, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 593–614 | Cite as

Selective linking from social platforms to university websites: a case study of the Spanish academic system

  • Enrique Orduña-Malea
  • José-Antonio Ontalba-Ruipérez


Mention indicators have frequently been used in Webometric studies because they provide a powerful tool for determining the degree of visibility and impact of web resources. Among mention indicators, hypertextual links were a central part of many studies until Yahoo! discontinued the ‘linkdomain’ command in 2011. Selective links constitute a variant of external links where both the source and target of the link can be selected. This paper intends to study the influence of social platforms (measured through the number of selective external links) on academic environments, in order to ascertain both the percentage that they constitute and whether some of them can be used as substitutes of total external links. For this purpose, 141 URLs belonging to 76 Spanish universities were compiled in 2010 (before Yahoo! stopped their link services), and the number of links from 13 selected social platforms to these universities were calculated. Results confirm a good correlation between total external links and links that come from social platforms, with the exception of some applications (such as Digg and Technorati). For those universities with a higher number of total external links, the high correlation is only maintained on Delicious and Wikipedia, which can be utilized as substitutes of total external links in the context analyzed. Notwithstanding, the global percentage of links from social platforms constitute only a small fraction of total links, although a positive trend is detected, especially in services such as Twitter, Youtube, and Facebook.


Webometrics Universities Spain Social platforms Sharing resource systems External links 

Supplementary material

11192_2012_851_MOESM1_ESM.docx (112 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 111 kb)


  1. Aguillo, I. F. (2009a). Measuring the institutions’ footprint in the web. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 540–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguillo, IF. (2009b). Cibermetría: introducción teórico-práctica. Version 1.56 (unpublished teaching material).Google Scholar
  3. Alonso Berrocal, J. L., Figuerola, C. G., & Zazo, A. F. (2004). Cibermetria: nuevas tecnicas de estudio aplicables al Web. Gijon: Trea.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Ilan, J. (2003). A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country—the case of Israel. Scientometrics, 59(3), 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environments. Information Processing & Management, 41(4), 973–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, L., Tague-Sutcliffe, J., & Kinnucan, M. T. (1996). Labeled, typed links as cues when reading hypertext documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(12), 896–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjorneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabezas-Clavijo, A., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Google scholar citations y la emergencia de nuevos actores en la evaluación de la investigación. Anuario Thinkepi, 6, 147–153.Google Scholar
  9. Cronin, B., Snyder, H., Rosenbaum, H., Martinson, A., & Callahan, E. (1998). Invoked on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1319–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhyani, D., Keong Ng, W., &, SS Bhowmick (2002) A survey of Web Metrics. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(4), 469–503.Google Scholar
  11. Eysenbach, G. (2012). Can Tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4).Google Scholar
  12. Faba-Perez, C., Bote, Guerrero, Vicente, P., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2004). Fundamentos y técnicas cibermétricas. Mérida: Junta de Extremadura.Google Scholar
  13. Garcia-Santiago, M. D. (2001). Topología de la información en la World Wide Web: modelo experimental y bibliométrico en una red hipertextual nacional. Granada: Universidad, Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson, D., Kleinberg, J. & Raghavan, P. (1998a). Inferring web communities from link topology. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 225–234). Accessed 4 June 2012.
  15. Gibson, D., Kleinberg, J. & Raghavan, P. (1998b). Structural analysis of the World Wide Web. In: World Wide Web Consortium Workshop on Web Characterization. Position paper. Accessed 4 June 2012.
  16. Haas, S. W., & Grams, E. S. (1998). A link taxonomy of Web pages. Proceedings of the 61st ASIS annual meeting (pp. 485–495).Google Scholar
  17. Heylighen, F. (2000). Web connectivity analysis. Accessed 4 June 2012.
  18. Katz, J.S. (2004). Co-link web indicators of the European Research Area: web indicators for scientific, technological and innovation research (Technical report).Google Scholar
  19. Kim, H. J. (2000). Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: a qualitative study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10), 887–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larson, R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the world wide web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. Proceedings of AISS 59th annual meeting (pp. 71–78). Accessed 4 June 2012.
  21. Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2011). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nielsen, F. Å. (2007). Scientific citations in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12(8). Accessed 4 June 2012.
  23. Orduña-Malea, E., Serrano-Cobos, J., Ontalba-Ruipérez, J.-A., & Lloret-Romero, N. (2010). Presencia y visibilidad web de las universidades públicas españolas. Revista española de documentación científica, 33(2), 246–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Priem, J. & Hemminger, B. M. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). Accessed 4 June 2012.
  26. Rocki, M. (2005). Statistical and mathematical aspects of rankings: lessons from Poland. Higher education in Europe, 30(2), 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Lomi, A., Aguillo, I., & Barberio, V. (2012). Factors affecting web links between European higher education institutions. Journal of informetrics, 6, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, A. G. (1999). A tale of two web spaces: comparing sites using web impact factors. Journal of documentation, 55(5), 577–592.Google Scholar
  29. Thelwall, M. (2001). Extracting macroscopic information from web links. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1157–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to Webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, v. 1, n. 1).Google Scholar
  31. Thelwall, M. (2010). Webometrics: emergent or doomed? Information research, 15(4). Accessed 4 June 2012.
  32. Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., & Price, E. (2003). Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of information science, 29(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Orduña-Malea
    • 1
  • José-Antonio Ontalba-Ruipérez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Audiovisual Communication, Documentation, and History of ArtPolytechnic University of Valencia (UPV)ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations