, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 1297–1312 | Cite as

The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded

  • Yuh-Shan Ho


This study aimed to identify and analyze the characteristics of the top-cited articles published in the Science Citation Index Expanded from 1991 to 2010. Articles that have been cited more than 1,000 times since publication to 2010 were assessed regarding their distribution in indexed journals and categories of the Web of Science. Five bibliometric indicators were used to evaluate source institutions and countries. A new indicator, the Y-index, is proposed to assess publication quantity and the character of contribution to articles. We identify 3,652 top-cited articles with 71 % originating from US. The fourteen most productive institutions were all located in US. Science, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, and Cell hosted the most cited publications. In addition, the Y-index was successfully applied to evaluate the publication character of authors, institutions, and countries.


Web of Science SCI-Expanded Bibliometric Most cited publication Y-index 


  1. Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J. H., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(17), 3389–3402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltussen, A., & Kindler, C. H. (2004). Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 98(2), 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becke, A. D. (1993). Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. Journal of Chemical Physics, 98(7), 5648–5652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15(3), 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (1998). Crystallography and NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography, 54, 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brush, S. G. (1990). The most cited physical sciences publications in the 1945–1954 Science Citation Index. Current Contents, 20, 7–17.Google Scholar
  7. Burman, K. D. (1982). Hanging from the masthead—Reflections on authorship. Annals of Internal Medicine, 97(2), 602–605.Google Scholar
  8. Celayir, S., Sander, S., Ellicevik, M., Vural, A., & Celayir, A. C. (2008). The most commonly cited articles in pediatric surgical journals. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 18(3), 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, S. R., Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2005). Asthma in children: Mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis. Revue Française d’Allergologie et d’Immunologie Clinique, 45(6), 442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information. Scientometrics, 87(3), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiu, W.T., & Ho,Y.S. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  12. Coats, A. J. S. (2009). Ethical authorship and publishing. International Journal of Cardiology, 131(2), 149–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2011). Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics, 88(1), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dotson, B., & Slaughter, R. L. (2011). Prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authors in three pharmacy journals. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 68(18), 1730–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engers, M., Gans, J. S., Grant, S., & King, S. P. (1999). First-author conditions. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 859–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fu, H. Z., Ho, Y. S., Sui, Y. M., & Li, Z. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993–2008. Waste Management, 30(12), 2410–2417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furlan, J. C., & Fehlings, M. G. (2006). A web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the “citation classics” with the consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Neurotrauma, 23(2), 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaeta, T. J. (1999). Authorship: “Law” and order. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6(4), 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through the association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garfield, E. (1964). “Science Citation Index”—New dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619), 649–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5259), 669–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garfield, E. (1989). An introduction to the 102 most cited life sciences publications in the new 1945–1954 Science Citation Index. 1. Titles, journals, and research fronts by Dixon, Bernard. Current Contents, 15, 3–10.Google Scholar
  24. Garfield, E. (1990). The Russians are coming. 2. The top 50 soviet papers most cited in the 1973–1988 Science Citation Index and a look at 1988 research fronts. Current Contents, 25, 3–13.Google Scholar
  25. Garfield, E., & Welljamsdorof, A. (1992). Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high-impact research authors. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gehanno, J. F., Takahashi, K., Darmoni, S., & Weber, J. (2007). Citation classics in occupational medicine journals. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 33(4), 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Han, J. S., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Global trends and performances of acupuncture research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 680–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hennessey, K., Afshar, K., & MacNeily, A. E. (2009). The top 100 cited articles in urology. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 3(4), 293–302.Google Scholar
  29. Herbertz, H., & Müller-Hill, B. (1995). Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: A bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes. Research Policy, 24(6), 959–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho, Y. S., Satoh, H., & Lin, S. Y. (2010). Japanese lung cancer research trends and performance in Science Citation Index. Internal Medicine, 49(20), 2219–2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsieh, W. H., Chiu, W. T., Lee, Y. S., & Ho, Y. S. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of patent ductus arteriosus treatments. Scientometrics, 60(2), 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huth, E. J. (1986). Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 269–274.Google Scholar
  34. Iijima, S. (1991). Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature, 354(6348), 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y. P., Xu, J. Q., & Thun, M. J. (2009). Cancer Statistics, 2009. CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59(4), 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jin, B. H. (2006). h-index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8–9.Google Scholar
  37. Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W., & Kjeldgaard, M. (1991). Improved methods for building protein models in electron-density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 47(1), 110–119.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Exploring the web visibility of world-class universities. Scientometrics, 90(1), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lefaivre, K. A., Shadgan, B., & O’Brien, P. J. (2011). 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 469(5), 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, L. L., Ding, G. H., Feng, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2009a). Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 75(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, J. F., Zhang, Y. H., Wang, X. S., & Ho, Y. S. (2009b). Bibliometric analysis of atmospheric simulation trends in meteorology and atmospheric science journals. Croatica Chemica Acta, 82(3), 695–705.Google Scholar
  44. Lin, H. W., Yu, T. C., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). A systemic review of the human papillomavirus studies: Global publication comparison and research trend analyses from 1993 to 2008. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 32(2), 133–140.Google Scholar
  45. Li, J.F., Wang, M.H., & Ho, Y.S. (2011), Trends in research on global climate change: A Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis. Global and Planetary Change, 77(1–2), 13–20.Google Scholar
  46. Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT method. Methods, 25(4), 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malin, M. V. (1968). Science Citation Index—A new concept in indexing. Library Trends, 16(3), 374–387.Google Scholar
  48. Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C. J., & Laget, P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 87(1), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nieri, M., Saletta, D., Guidi, L., Buti, J., Franceschi, D., Mauro, S., et al. (2007). Citation classics in periodontology: A controlled study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 34(4), 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2010). The 101 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology journals from 1850 to 1949. Archives of Ophthalmology, 128(12), 1610–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ohba, N., Nakao, K., Isashiki, Y., & Ohba, A. (2007). The 100 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology journals. Archives of Ophthalmology, 125(7), 952–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ollerton, J. E., & Sugrue, M. (2005). Citation classics in trauma. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 58(2), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paladugu, R., Schein, M., Gardezi, S., & Wise, L. (2002). One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World Journal of Surgery, 26(9), 1099–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 77(18), 3865–3868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998). MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14(9), 817–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Riesenberg, D., & Lundberg, G. D. (1990). The order of authorship—Who’s on first. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(14), 1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenberg, A. L., Tripathi, R. S., & Blum, J. (2010). The most influential articles in critical care medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 25(1), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schein, M., Paladugu, R., & Sutija, V. G. (2000). What American surgeons read: a survey of a thousand Fellows of the American College of Surgeons. Current Surgery, 57(3), 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 64(1), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singh, S. (2009). Criteria for authorship. Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology, 75(2), 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Slone, R. M. (1996). Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship. American Journal of Roentgenology, 167(3), 571–579.Google Scholar
  62. Spek, A. L. (2009). Structure validation in chemical crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography, 65, 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suk, F. M., Lien, G. S., Yu, T. C., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Global trends in Helicobacter pylori research from 1991 to 2008 analyzed with the Science Citation Index Expanded. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 23(4), 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tanaka, H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Global trends and performances of desalination research. Desalination and Water Treatment, 25(1–3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. The role and responsibilities of coauthors. (2008). Lancet, 372(9641), 778.Google Scholar
  66. Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., & Higgins, D. G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(24), 4876–4882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22), 4673–4680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, M. H., Li, J. F., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Research articles published in water resources journals: A bibliometric analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 28(1–3), 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang, M. H., Yu, T. C., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Water Research. Scientometrics, 84(3), 813–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual-framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zuckerman, H. A. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74(3), 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trend Research CentreAsia UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations