, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 325–331 | Cite as

Thirty years of Brazilian research in Antarctica: ups, downs and perspectives

  • V. M. Stefenon
  • L. F. W. Roesch
  • A. B. Pereira


The Antarctic continent is the most untouched region of the world but is also among the most vulnerable to global environmental change. Alterations to the Antarctic environment can have cascading effects many of which are unpredictable. Our objective was to investigate the contribution of Brazilian scientists to Antarctic research and to characterize the actions taken by the country to improve its scientific output and its international impact in this area. Scientific publications related to Antarctica, released from 1981 to 2011 were searched using three important science data bases. The data were used to determine the absolute increase and the relative growth rate of publications in order to characterize the contribution of Brazil to the world’s scientific understanding of Antarctica. The number of publications revealed an undersized contribution of the Brazilian science to the world’s publications about Antarctica. However, over the last 30 years there has been a substantial increase in the number of publications associated with governmental financial policies. As in other countries, Brazil’s most significant scientific contributions regarding the Antarctic continent are in the biological sciences. Therefore, public policies should maintain the current official support, while the research groups should pay attention to strategic scientific and technological areas still uncovered in the Antarctic research.


Antarctic continent Bibliometric analysis Relative growth rate Financial support Public policies 



The authors were supported by the Brazilian Antarctic Program through the CNPq (process 574018/2008), FAPERJ (process E-26/170.023/2008), Ministry of Environment—MMA, Ministry of Science and Technology—MCT and CIRM.


  1. Arigony-Neto, J., Saurer, H., Simões, J. C., Rau, F., Jaña, R., Vogt, S., et al. (2009). Spatial and temporal changes in dry-snow line altitude on the Antarctic Peninsula. Climatic Change, 94, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajwa, R.S., Yaldram, K., & Rafique, S. (2012) A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/S11192-012-0699-4
  3. Cipro, C. V. Z., Yogui, G. T., Bustamante, P., Taniguchi, S., Sericano, J. L., & Montone, R. C. (2011). Organic pollutants and their correlation with stable isotopes in vegetation from King George Island, Antarctica. Chemosphere, 85, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galvez, A., Maqueda, M., Martinez-Bueno, M., & Valdivia, E. (2000). Scientific publication trends and the developing world. American Scientist, 88, 526.Google Scholar
  5. Holmgren, M., & Schnitzer, S. A. (2004). Science on the rise in developing countries. PLoS Biology, 2, e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leta, J., Glanzel, W., & Thus, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leta, J., Jaques, R., Figueira, I., & de Meis, L. (2001). Central visibility of Brazilian psychiatric publications from 1981 to 1995. Scientometrics, 50, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luz, A. P., Ciapina, E. M. P., et al. (2006). Potential for bioremediation of hydrocarbon polluted soils in the Maritime Antarctic. Antarctic Science, 18(3), 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McConell, J. R., Aristarain, A. J., Banta, J. R., Edwards, P. R., & Simões, J. C. (2007). 20th-Century doubling in dust archived in an Antarctic Peninsula ice core parallels climate change and desertification in South America. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(14), 5743–5748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Miranda-Filho, K. C., Metcalfe, T. L., Metcalfe, C. D., Robaldo, R. B., Muelbert, M. M. C., Colares, E. P., et al. (2007). Residues of Persistent Organochlorine Contaminants in Southern Elephant Seals (Mirounga leonina) from Elephant island, Antarctica. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 3829–3835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pereira, B. K., Rosa, R. M., et al. (2009). Protective effects of three extracts from Antarctic plants against ultraviolet radiation in several biological models. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 96, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pitman, N. C. A., Widmer, J., Jenkins, C. N., Stocks, G., Seales, L., Paniagua, F., et al. (2011). Volume and geographical distribution of ecological research in the Andes and the Amazon, 1995–2008. Tropical Conservation Science, 4(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  13. Posser, T., Pereira, B. K., Zemolin, A. P. P., Dal Belo, C. A., pereira, A. B., & Franco, J. L. (2011). Insecticidal effects of Antarctic algae Prasiola crispa extract in the adult fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Annual Activity Report 2010, National Institute of Science and Technology Antarctic Environmental Research, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar
  14. Souza, J. E. B. (2008). Brasil na Antártica—25 anos de história. São Carlos, SP, Vento Verde Editora.Google Scholar
  15. Stocks, G., Seales, L., Paniagua, F., Maehr, E., & Bruna, E. M. (2008). The geographical and institutional distribution of ecological research in the tropics. Biotropica, 40, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. M. Stefenon
    • 1
  • L. F. W. Roesch
    • 1
  • A. B. Pereira
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Science and Technology-Antarctic Environmental Research (INCT-APA)Universidade Federal do Pampa/Campus São GabrielSão GabrielBrazil

Personalised recommendations