A fitness model for scholarly impact analysis
- 432 Downloads
We propose a model to analyze citation growth and influences of fitness (competitiveness) factors in an evolving citation network. Applying the proposed method to modeling citations to papers and scholars in the InfoVis 2004 data, a benchmark collection about a 31-year history of information visualization, leads to findings consistent with citation distributions in general and observations of the domain in particular. Fitness variables based on prior impacts and the time factor have significant influences on citation outcomes. We find considerably large effect sizes from the fitness modeling, which suggest inevitable bias in citation analysis due to these factors. While raw citation scores offer little insight into the growth of InfoVis, normalization of the scores by influences of time and prior fitness offers a reasonable depiction of the field’s development. The analysis demonstrates the proposed model’s ability to produce results consistent with observed data and to support meaningful comparison of citation scores over time.
KeywordsCitation analysis Normalized citation scores Preferential attachment Fitness Citation network Scholarly impact Information visualization
I would like to thank Thomas Carsey, Paul Solomon, and Cassidy R. Sugimoto for valuable discussions. I also appreciate constructive comments from Jeff Harden, Ellen Gutman and anonymous Scientometrics reviewers.
- Amaral, L.A.N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., Stanley, H.E. (2000a). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(21), 11149–11152. http://www.pnas.org/content/97/21/11149.abstract, http://www.pnas.org/content/97/21/11149.full.pdf+html.
- Barabási, A.L. (2009). Scale-free networks: A decade and beyond. Science, 325, 412–413. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/325/5939/412.Google Scholar
- Börner, K., Dall’Asta, L., Ke, W., Vespignani, A. (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity, Special Issue on Understanding Complex Systems, 10(4), 58–67.Google Scholar
- Fekete, J.D., Grinstein, G., Plaisant, C. (2004). InfoVis 2004 contest: The history of InfoVis. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/iv04contest/.
- Ke, W., Börner, K., Viswanath, L. (2004). Major information visualization authors, papers and topics in the acm library. In INFOVIS ’04: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS’04). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Lee, S., Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359, http://sss.sagepub.com/content/35/5/673.abstract, http://sss.sagepub.com/content/35/5/673.full.pdf+html.
- Perc, M. (2010). Growth and structure of slovenia’s scientific collaboration network. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 475–482. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.003, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157710000362.Google Scholar
- Plaisant, C., Fekete, J., Grinstein, G. (2004). Promoting insight based evaluation of visualizations: From contest to benchmark repository. Technical report, HCIL, University of Maryland. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/pubs/tech-reports.shtml.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348–349.Google Scholar
- Robert, G., Sumner, J. (1995). Utilizing the age of references to control the exhaustivity of the reference representation in information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 31, 29–45.Google Scholar