Ranking of research output of universities on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential fields: Spanish universities as a case of study
- 447 Downloads
A university may be considered as having dimension-specific prestige in a scientific field (e.g., physics) when a particular bibliometric research performance indicator exceeds a threshold value. But a university has multidimensional prestige in a field of study only if it is influential with respect to a number of dimensions. The multidimensional prestige of influential fields at a given university takes into account that several prestige indicators should be used for a distinct analysis of the influence of a university in a particular field of study. After having identified the multidimensionally influential fields of study at a university their prestige scores can be aggregated to produce a summary measure of the multidimensional prestige of influential fields at this university, which satisfies numerous properties. Here we use this summary measure of multidimensional prestige to assess the comparative performance of Spanish Universities during the period 2006–2010.
KeywordsPublication-based ranking Spanish universities Bibliometrics Multidimensional prestige Influential fields of study
This research was sponsored by the Spanish Board for Science and Technology (MICINN) under grant TIN2010-15157 cofinanced with European FEDER funds. Thanks are due to the reviewers for their constructive suggestions.
- Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2008). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement, Working Paper 7, Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI).Google Scholar
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(11), 1841–1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2012a). A comparison of top economics departments in the US and EU on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential articles in 2010. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0708-7.
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102(46), 16569–16572.Google Scholar
- Peichl, A. Schaefer, T., & Scheicher, C. (2008). Measuring richness and poverty: A micro data application to Europe and Germany. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 3790.Google Scholar
- Peichl, A., & Pestel, N. (2010). Multidimensional measurement of richness: Theory and an application to Germany. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 4825.Google Scholar
- Rankings ISI of Spanish universities according to fields and scientific disciplines: Methodology, (2011). Retrieved Dec, 2011, from http://sci2s.ugr.es/rankinguniversidades/downloads/rankings_2011_methodologyEnglish.pdf.
- Academic ranking of world universities (ARWU). (2011). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Retrieved Dec, 2011, from http://www.arwu.org/index.js.
- Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2011). University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (The Changing Academy—The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective). Dordrecht: Springer, ISBN 9789400711167.Google Scholar
- Torres-Salinas, D., Moreno-Torres, J. G., Robinson-García, N., Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Herrera, F. (2011b). Rankings ISI de las universidades españolas según campos y disciplinas científicas (2nd ed.). El Profesional de la Información, 20:6, 701–711.Google Scholar