Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences?
- 1.4k Downloads
Thomson Reuter’s ISI Web of Knowledge (or ISI for short) is used in the majority of benchmarking analyses and bibliometric research projects. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the limitations of data provided by ISI. This article deals with a limitation that disproportionally affects the Social Sciences: ISI’s misclassification of journal articles containing original research into the “review” or “proceedings paper” category. I report on a comprehensive, 11 year analysis, of document categories for 27 journals in nine Social Science and Science disciplines. I show that although ISI’s “proceedings paper” and “review” classifications seem to work fairly well in the Sciences, they illustrate a profound misunderstanding of research and publication practices in the Social Sciences.
KeywordsThomson Reuters Web of knowledge Document categories Social Sciences Review articles Proceedings papers
- Harzing, A. W., Metz I. (2012a). Practicing what we preach: The geographic diversity of editorial boards, Management International Review. doi: 10.1007/s11575-011-0124-x.
- Harzing, A. W., Metz I. (2012b). Explaining geographic diversity of editorial boards: The role of conference participation and english language skills. European Journal of International Management, 5(3) (in press).Google Scholar
- Harzing, A. W., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google scholar as a new source for citation analysis? Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 62–71.Google Scholar
- Metz, I., Harzing, A. W. (2012). An update of gender diversity in Editorial Boards: A longitudinal Study of management journals, Personnel Review, 41(3), 283–300.Google Scholar
- Reedijk, J. (1998). Sense and nonsense of science citation analyses: Comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data. New Journal of Chemistry, 22, 767–770.Google Scholar
- Thomson Reuters. (1994). The Thomson Reuters impact factor. http://thomsonreuters.com/-products_services-/science/free/essays/impact_factor/. Accessed January 3, 2012.
- Thomson Reuters. (2008). Why has the number of articles in Web of Science gone down, and the number of proceedings papers gone up? http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/-multidisciplinary/webofscience/cpci/usingproceedings/. Accessed January 3, 2012.
- Thomson Reuters. (2011). The hottest research of 2010. http://www.sciencewatch.com/-ana/fea/11maraprFea/. Accessed January 3, 2012.
- Thomson Reuters. (nd). Essential Science Indicators SM data information: Understanding core data—Hot papers, http://sciencewatch.com/about/met/core-hp/. Accessed January 3, 2012.