Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Research productivity among trainee anaesthetists in Ireland: a cross-sectional study

  • 275 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Objective measures of research performance are necessary to facilitate academic advancement of trainee physicians. In this cross-sectional study, all anaesthetists (n = 98) in higher specialist training in Ireland were surveyed to determine bibliometrics of their scientific publications and individual and institutional characteristics that can influence research productivity. For trainees with publications, the median (range) h-index was 1 (0–4). There was a positive correlation between participation in a formal research program and increased research productivity using mean citations per publication (r 2 = 0.26, P = 0.006) and h-index (r 2 = 0.26, P = 0.006). There was a positive correlation between formal mentorship and mean citations per publication (r 2 = 0.15, P = 0.04) and h-index (r 2 = 0.17, P = 0.03).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ball, P. (2007). Achievement index climbs the ranks. Nature, 448(7155), 737.

  2. Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 225–237.

  3. Bould, M. D., Boet, S., Sharma, B., Shin, E., Barrowman, N. J., & Grantcharov, T. (2011). h-Indices in a university department of anaesthesia: an evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106(3), 325–330.

  4. Butson, M. J., & Yu, P. K. (2010). The first author h-index (h(fa)-index): levelling the field for small and large institute medical and science scholars. Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 33(4), 299–300.

  5. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 607–631.

  6. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

  7. Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092–1096.

  8. O’Leary, J. D., & Crawford, M. W. (2010). Bibliographic characteristics of the research output of pediatric anesthesiologists in Canada. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 57(6), 573–577.

  9. Pagel, P. S., & Hudetz, J. A. (2011). An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia, 66(10), 873–878.

  10. Patsopoulos, N. A., Analatos, A. A., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(19), 2362–2366.

  11. Steiner, J. F., Curtis, P., Lanphear, B. P., Vu, K. O., & Main, D. S. (2004). Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Academic Medicine, 79(9), 865–872.

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for this study (ECM 4 (o) 11/01/11) was provided by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals, Cork, Ireland (Chairperson Dr Michael Hyland) on 14th December 2010.

Author information

Correspondence to James D. O’Leary.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Study questionnaire (administered by SurveyMonkey)- version 02.11.2010.

  1. 1.

    Participant demographics:

    • i. Your gender: male/female

    • ii. What year did you graduate from medical school?

    • iii. What is your current training point (e.g. year 1, year 1.5) on the National Specialist Training Scheme in Anaesthesia?

  2. 2.

    Individual and institutional characteristics influencing research productivity:

    • i. Have you participated in a formal research program? Yes/No

    • ii. Have you received formal training in the conduct of research in medicine? Yes/No

    • iii. Have you ever been formally assigned a senior colleague to mentor your research? Yes/No

    • iv. Is informal mentoring and support from senior colleagues available in your area(s) of research interest?

    • (1 strongly agree, 2 somewhat agree, 3 neither agree nor disagree, 4 somewhat disagree, and 5 strongly disagree).

    • v. Would you describe yourself as being internally driven to conduct research?

    • (1 strongly agree, 2 somewhat agree, 3 neither agree nor disagree, 4 somewhat disagree, and 5 strongly disagree).

    • vi. Are you “up-to-date” on the current literature in your research area(s)?

    • (1 strongly agree, 2 somewhat agree, 3 neither agree nor disagree, 4 somewhat disagree, and 5 strongly disagree).

    • vii. On average, how many hours each week are you involved in research activity?

    • viii. Are there any other factors which you think strongly influence your research performance?

  3. 3.

    Scientific publication information:

    • i. What variations of your name you have used for authorship of scientific publications?

    • ii. What institutional affiliations have you used for publishing your research output?

    • iii. In which year was your first scientific publication?

    • iv. On how many scientific papers in peer-review journals have you been credited an authorship?

  4. 4.

    Contact email address for individual and aggregated results:

    • Please enter your email address here if you would like to receive a copy of your individual citation profile (Web of Science®), and a summary profile of the bibliometric characteristics of the cohort when the study is completed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Leary, J.D., O’Sullivan, O. Research productivity among trainee anaesthetists in Ireland: a cross-sectional study. Scientometrics 93, 431–438 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0684-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Research productivity
  • Bibliometrics
  • Anaesthesia
  • Medical education and training