Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 92, Issue 2, pp 249–260 | Cite as

Journal report card

  • Judit Bar-Ilan
Article

Abstract

The impact factor is one of the most used scientometric indicators. Its proper and improper uses have been discussed extensively before. It has been criticized extensively, yet it is still here. In this paper I propose the journal report card, which is a set of measures, each with an easily comprehensible meaning that provides a fuller picture of the journals’ standing. The set of measures in the report card include the impact factor, the h-index, number of citations at different points on the ranked list of citations, extent of uncitedness and coverage of the h-core. The report card is computed for two sets of journals, the top-20 journals in JCR 2010 and the top-20 journals in JCR 2010 for the category Information and Library Science.

Keywords

Journal report card Median 90% percentile Synchronous h-index for journals 

References

  1. Australian Research Council (no date). Ranked outlets. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_2010/archive/era_journal_list.htm.
  2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Rankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor—Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314–316.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1996). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117.Google Scholar
  7. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (2011). Methodology. Retrieved from http://www.leidenranking.com/methodology.aspx.
  8. Egghe, L. (2006). The theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. eigenfactor.org (no date). Eigenfactor score and article influence score: Detailed methods. Retrieved from http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.pdf.
  10. González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2009). The SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals’ scientific prestige. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.4141.pdf.
  11. Harzing, A. W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics & business? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., & Wormell, I. (2000). Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluation. In B. Cronin & H. Barsky Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge. A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 373–387). Medford: Information Today.Google Scholar
  13. Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moed, H. F., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information’s journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moed, H. F., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1996). Impact factors can mislead. Nature, 381(6579), 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0.
  18. Zitt, M. (2010). Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zitt, M., & Small, H. (2008). Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1856–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations