Scientometrics

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 233–251 | Cite as

Analysis of publication patterns in Korean library and information science research

Article

Abstract

This study assessed research patterns and trends of library and information science (LIS) in Korea by applying bibliometric analysis to 159 Korean LIS professors’ 2,401 peer-reviewed publications published between 2001 and 2010. Bibliometric analysis of publication data found an increasing trend for collaboration, robust publication patterns, increasing number of international publications, and internationalization of LIS in Korea. The maturation and internalization of LIS research was evidenced in increased number of publications in high impact journals (e.g., SSI, SSCI), growing participation in leading international conferences (e.g., ASIST, TREC), increasing proportion of Korean LIS faculty with international degrees, and high publication rates by professors with international degrees. Though limited in its evaluative power without citation data, publication data can be a rich source for bibliometric analysis as this study has shown. The analysis of publication patterns conducted by the study, which is a first step in our aim to establish a multi-faceted approach for assessing the impact of scholarly work, will be followed up in a future study, where the question of quantity versus quality will be examined by comparing publication counts with citation counts.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis Publication patterns Research productivity Library and information science Korea 

References

  1. Adkins, D., & Budd, J. (2006). Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty. Library & Information Science Research, 28, 374–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho, I. S., & Han, M. S. (2007). An analysis on the articles and cited journals suggested by LIS researchers of Korea. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 18(2), 89–105.Google Scholar
  3. Choi, H. K. (1999). An analytical study on research patterns in library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 16(3), 137–157.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi, H. K. (2003). A study on the research patterns of domestic library & information researchers through LISA & ISA. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 37(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung, J. S. (2001). An analytical study on research trends of library and information science in Korea: 1996–2000. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 35(3), 55–78.Google Scholar
  6. Chung, J. S. (2009). A study on assessment of faculty performance in research achievement: A focus on library and information science field. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 20(2), 129–142.Google Scholar
  7. Chung, J. Y., & Park, J. H. (2011). Analysis of the trends in the field studies of library and information science in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 171–192.Google Scholar
  8. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  9. Glanzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thus, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han, S. W., & Cho, I. S. (1996). Munheonjeongbohagbunya haghoijiui nonmunbunseok. Doseogwan, 51(1), 114–139.Google Scholar
  11. Holmes, A., & Oppenheim, C. (2001). Use of citation analysis to predict the outcome of the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise for Unit of Assessment (UoA) 61: Library and Information Management. Information Research, 6(2). Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://informationr.net/ir/6-2/paper103.html.
  12. Ko, Y. M., Cho, S. R., & Park, Y. S. (2011). A study on the optimization of KCI-based index (Kor-Factor) in evaluating Korean journals. Scientometrics, 88, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, M. H. (2002). Recent trends in research methods in library and information science: Content analysis of the journal articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(3), 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, E. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing Asian scholarly research in library and information science: a quantitative view as reflected in Web of Knowledge. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oh, S. H. (2005). A study on the research trends of library & information science in Korea by analyzing journal articles and the cited literatures. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sohn, J. P. (2003). An analytical study on research trends of library and information science in Korea: 1957–2002. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 34(3), 9–32.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Song, J. S. (2010). Trends in library and information science research in Korea: Focused on master’s theses and doctoral dissertations from 2001 to 2010. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(4), 333–353.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Library and Information ScienceKeimyung UniversityDaeguKorea
  2. 2.Information Service CenterKorea Institute of Science and Technology InformationDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations