Scientometrics

, Volume 91, Issue 3, pp 977–996 | Cite as

State of the art on the Systems of Innovation research: a bibliometrics study up to 2009

  • Mauricio Uriona-Maldonado
  • Raimundo N. M. dos Santos
  • Gregorio Varvakis
Article

Abstract

Over the last decades there has been a growing interest on developing research and formulating public policy by using the Innovation Systems approach. However, as evidenced on the academic literature there is a lack of systematic, chronological and synthesizing studies indicating how this field has evolved over time. This paper has as main objective to consolidate the state of the art of academic research on IS, based on a bibliometrics study on literature published over the past 35 years. The results are discussed under the following perspectives: general results, chronological distribution, author relevance, articles and cited references of relevance, journals relevance and institutions and countries relevance. The paper ends with a discussion of the main implications and limitations of the study.

Keywords

Innovation Systems Systems of Innovation Bibliometrics 

JEL Classification

B52 C02 O1 O3 

References

  1. Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1995). The globalization of technology—A new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121–140.Google Scholar
  2. Arundel, A., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B. Ã., & Valeyre, A. (2007). How Europe’s economies learn: A comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 1175–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellis, N. d. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Maryland: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowonder, B., & Miyake, T. (1992). A model of corporate innovation management—some recent high tech innovations in japan. R & D Management, 22(4), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, H. (1975). Military innovation system and qualitative arms-race. Daedalus, 104(3), 75–97.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations and Innovation), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems—competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1563–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories—A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (Eds.). (1988). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Edgington, D. W. (2008). The Japanese innovation system: University—industry linkages, small firms and regional technology clusters. Prometheus, 26(1), 1–19.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national innovation system? In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—Complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, C. (2004). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 541–569. doi:10.1093/icc/dth022.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583–589. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science Technology Human Values, 34(4), 476–501. doi:10.1177/0162243908329187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., & Sjoberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multitechnology corporations. R & D Management, 22(2), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krupp, H. (1983). Overview of policy issues—panel report on the functions of non-university research institutes in national R-and-D and innovation systems and the contributions of universities. Technology in Society, 5(3–4), 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, S. H., & Yoo, T. (2007). Government policy and trajectories of radical innovation in dirigiste states: A comparative analysis of national innovation systems in France and Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 451–470. doi:10.1080/09537320701403383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundvall, B. A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process. From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Lundvall, B. A. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lundvall, B. A. (2004). Introduction to ‘Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness’ by Christopher Freeman. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 531–539. doi:10.1093/icc/dth021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Macdowall, J. (1984). The technology innovation system in Japan. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(3), 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1999). Technological entry, exit and survival: An empirical analysis of patent data. Research Policy, 28(6), 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mowery, D. C. (1992). The U.S. national innovation system: Origins and prospects for change. Research Policy, 21(2), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nelson, R. R. (1988). Institutions supporting technical change in the United States. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 312–329). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, R. R. (1992). National innovation systems: A retrospective on a study. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2), 347–374. doi:10.1093/icc/1.2.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nelson, R. R. (2007). Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Globelics Working Paper Series (p. 25). Beijing: Globelics.Google Scholar
  48. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Niosi, J., & Tschang, F. T. (2009). The strategies of Chinese and Indian software multinationals: Implications for internationalization theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2), 269–294. doi:10.1093/icc/dtp005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society, 15(2), 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD (Ed.). (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. OECD (Ed.). (2009a). Measuring China’s innovation system—National specificities and international comparisons (Statistical Analysis of Science, Technology and Industry). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. OECD (Ed.). (2009b). OECD reviews of innovation policy—Korea. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  54. Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. Paris: OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Santos, R. N. M. (2003). Indicadores estratégicos em ciência e tecnologia: refletindo a sua prática como dispositivo de inclusão/exclusão social. TransInformação, 15(Edição Especial), 129–140.Google Scholar
  58. Santos, R. N. M., & Kobashi, N. Y. (2009). Bibliometria, cientometria, infometria: conceitos e aplicações. Pesq. bras. Ci. Inf., 2(1), 155–172.Google Scholar
  59. Shapiro, I. S. (1979). Does the judicial system stifle innovation? Judicature, 63(2), 57–58.Google Scholar
  60. Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature—New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Thornton, R. (1979). Patent issue—Effects of the patent system on innovation. Research Management, 22(2), 33–35.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66(1), 133–154. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0010-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis, 12(1), 20–29.Google Scholar
  67. Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ci. Inf., 31(2), 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauricio Uriona-Maldonado
    • 1
    • 3
  • Raimundo N. M. dos Santos
    • 2
  • Gregorio Varvakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Knowledge EngineeringFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianopolisBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Information ScienceFederal University of PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  3. 3.Research on Research GroupDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations