Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutions
- 937 Downloads
This study examines the impact of collaborating patterns on the R&D performance of public research institutions (PRIs) in Korea’s science and engineering fields. For the construction of R&D collaborating networks based on the co-authorship data of 127 institutions in Scopus, this paper proposes four types of collaborations by categorizing network analyses into two dimensions: structural positions (density, efficiency, and betweeness centrality) and the relational characteristics of individual nodes (eigenvector and closeness centralities). To explore the research performance by collaboration type, we employ a data envelopment analysis window analysis of a panel of 23 PRIs over a 10-year period. Comparing the R&D productivities of each group, we find that the PRIs of higher productivity adhere to a cohesive networking strategy, retaining intensive relations with their existing partners. The empirical results suggest that excessively cohesive alliances might end up in ‘lock-in’ relations, hindering the exploitation of new opportunities for innovation. These findings are implicit in relation to the Korean Government’s R&D policies on collaborating strategies to produce sustained research results with the advent of the convergence research era.
KeywordsCollaboration pattern R&D performance Social network analysis Science policy DEA window
Mathematical Subject Classification (2000)90B50
JEL ClassificationO32 O33
The authors acknowledge that this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2011-330-B00046).
- Brown, M., & Svenson, R. (1998). Measuring RD productivity. Research-Technology Management, 41(6), 30–35.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Choi, Y. (2003). Evolution of science and technology policy in Korea (Vol. 3). Korea: Science and Technology Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. In Handbook on data envelopment analysis (Vol. 164, pp. 1–39). International series in operations research & management science. US: Springer.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
- Kerssens-van Drongelen, I., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2010). The use of performance measurement tools for balancing short- and long-term NPD performances. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2, 54.Google Scholar
- Liberman, S., & Olmedo, R. L. (2008). Scientist’s semantic meaning of the concept of coauthorship. In Fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics and ninth COLLNET meeting, Berlin. Google Scholar
- MOST (2009). Korean science and technology fact book 2009. Ministry of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. E. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Research support, non-U.S. Government research support, U.S. Government, non-P.H.S. Proceedings of the National Academic of Science USA, 98(2), 404–409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.021544898.
- Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Research support, non-U.S. Government research support, U.S. Government, non-P.H.S. Proceedings of the National Academic of Science USA, 101(Suppl 1), 5200–5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307545100.
- Porac, J. F., Wade, J. B., Fischer, H. M., Brown, J., Kanfer, A., & Bowker, G. (2004). Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy, 33(4), 661–678. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502–517.Google Scholar
- Sueyoshi, T. (1992). Measuring technical, allocative and overall efficiencies using a DEA algorithm. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(2), 141–155.Google Scholar