Analysis of publications on sturgeon research between 1996 and 2010
- First Online:
- 353 Downloads
Sturgeon species are among the commercially most valuable and the most endangered groups of fish. To assess the existing literature published within the field of sturgeon research over the past 15 years (1996–2010) we applied a bibliometric approach, in order to identify patterns and trends of the published research in this field. The analysis was performed based upon articles obtained from the ISI Web of Knowledge online database. The results revealed that although all 27 sturgeon species have been objects of the research, species that are endangered or facing a high probability of extinction have received disproportionately less attention. White sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) was the most frequently studied species, but it was recently surpassed by Persian sturgeon (A. persicus). Early life phases have been among the central objects of the research, and genetics, especially the use of microsatellite DNA, is becoming increasingly popular and had the highest impact. Research related to aquaculture was prominent, while the research related to hybrids (as a commodity of aquaculture production) was decreasing in popularity. Papers dealing with conservation issues were most frequently focused on European sturgeon (A. sturio). A steady increase in the number of published articles over time was observed. However, the overall citation rate declined significantly over time. During the period reviewed, the sturgeon research published in peer reviewed journals dominantly originated from the USA and EU. Nevertheless, considering the current trend in output, it is very likely that the Asian countries, mainly Iran and China, will surpass them within the next 5–10 years. International and inter-institutional collaboration both tended to increase the impact of the research. Stimulation and improvement of the international cooperation should be considered as future priorities.
KeywordsAcipenser Huso Scaphirhynchus Pseudoscaphirhynchus Bibliometry Trends
- Asari, M. A., & Aziz, N. (2005). The use, misuse, and misconception of impact factor. The International Medical Journal, 4(2), 102–103.Google Scholar
- Igami, M., & Saka, A. (2007). Capturing the evolving nature of science, the development of new scientific indicators and the mapping of science. STI working paper 2007/1, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 53 pp.Google Scholar
- IMF. (2011). Nominal GDP list of countries, April 2011: Data for the year 2010. World Economic Outlook Database, International Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/weodata/index.aspx. Accessed 31 May 2011.
- Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., & von Ins, M. (2008). Scientific output and impact: Relative positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. In Kretschmer, H., & Havemann, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of WIS 2008, fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & ninth COLLNET meeting, Berlin, 9 pp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/. Accessed 31 May 2011.
- Persson, O., Luukkonen, T., & Hälikkä, S. (2000). A bibliometric study of Finnish science. Working papers No. 48/00, VTT, group for technology studies, Espoo, Finland, 74 pp. www.vtt.fi/inf/julkaisut/muut/2000/wp48.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2011.
- UNDP. (2010). Human Development Index and its components. United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table1.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2011.