Scientometrics

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 37–49 | Cite as

Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index

Article

Abstract

Except the alphabetic ordering authorship papers, the citations of multi-authored papers are allocated to the authors based on their contributions to the paper. For papers without clarification of contribution proportion, a function of author number and rank is presented to rightly determine the credit allocated proportion and allocated citations of each author. Our citation allocation scheme is between the equally fractional counting and the one using the inverse of author rank. It has a parameter to adjust the credit distribution among the different authors. The allocated citations can either be used alone to indicate one’s performance in a paper, or can be applied in the modification of h-index and g-index to represent the achievement of a scientist on the whole. The modified h-index and g-index of an author makes use of more papers in which he or she played important roles. Our method is suitable for the papers with wide range of author numbers.

Keywords

Citations Ranking Co-authorship Contribution evaluation h-Index g-Index 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

26B99 

JEL Classification

C13 

References

  1. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1381–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boxenbaum, H., Pivinski, F., & Ruberg, S. J. (1987). Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: Application of the waring distribution. Drug Metabolism Reviews, 18(4), 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chai, J. C., Hua, P. H., Rousseau, R., & Wan, J. K. (2008). The Adapted Pure h-Index. In H. Kretschmer & F. Havemann (Eds.), Proceedings of WIS 2008, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: The University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 558–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Solla Price, D. J. (1981). Multiple Authorship. Science, 212, 986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egghe, L. (2008). Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1608–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fersht, A. (2009). The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. PNAS, 106, 6883–6884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene, M. (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature, 450, 1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunsa, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS ONE, 3, e4021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably–not equally, geometricallyor arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84, 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102, 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85, 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodge, S. E., & Greenberg, D. A. (1981). Publication credit. Science, 213(4511), 950.Google Scholar
  19. Hu, X., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2010). In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices. Journal of Information Science, 36, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lukovits, I., & Vinkler, P. (1995). Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors. Social Indicators Research, 36, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Opthof, T., & Wilde, A. A. M. (2009). The Hirsch-index: A simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists. Netherlands Heart Journal, Volume, 17, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schreiber, M. (2008a). To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts. New Journal of Physics, 10, 040201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schreiber, M. (2008b). A modification of the h-index: The h(m)-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schreiber, M. (2009). Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60, 2145–2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schreiber, M. (2010). A case study of the modified g index: Counting multi-author publications fractionally. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 636–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sekercioglu, C. H. (2008). Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science, 322, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trueba, F. J., & Guerrero, H. (2004). A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics, 60, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 944–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wan, J. K., Hua, P. H., & Rousseau, R. (2007). The pure h-index: Calculating an author’s h-index by taking co-authors into account. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
  31. Zhang, C. T. (2009). A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO reports, 10, 416–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LibraryNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of Electronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life ScienceNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations