This study analysed the technical and publication activities of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE), the most influential academic publisher in engineering. We first constructed an original comprehensive database of periodicals (journal and magazine) and conference proceedings published by the IEEE between 1980 and 2008, which comprised approximately 0.36 million periodical articles and 1.14 million conference articles. We analysed the transitions in technical innovations from two perspectives: trends within (1) individual countries and (2) specialized fields represented in IEEE societies. The number of published periodical articles increased fourfold between 1980 and 2008, while that of published conference articles increased nearly 20-fold in the same period. In particular, the number of conference articles published by China increased dramatically from 2002, exceeding even the number published by the US in 2008. The IEEE has increasingly shifted away from its US-centred origins to literally becoming the ‘electrical and electronics association of the world’. The proportion of articles published by authors in North America, Europe and East Asia has increasingly balanced, thus leading to the formation of a tri-polar structure of IEEE technological activities. This comprehensive analysis of IEEE publications over a period of almost 30 years revealed that with the emergence of more active international competition, ‘glocalisation’ is occurring among publications and research activities of the IEEE. Consequently, quantitative analysis revealed structural changes in global competition and technological transition characterized by five phases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science. Scientometrics, 83(3), 809–824.
Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299–305.
Ginsperg, P. (1996). Winners and losers in the global research village. Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95.
Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35(1), 31–44.
Glänzel, W., Schelemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data sources for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3), 457–473.
Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71–88.
Godin, B. (1998). Measuring knowledge flows between countries: The use of scientific meeting data. Scientometrics, 42(3), 313–323.
Goodrum, A. A., McCain, K. W., Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (2001). Scholarly publishing in the Internet age: A citation analysis of computer science literature. Information Processing and Management, 37(5), 661–674.
Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890–906.
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23–36.
Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, É. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibiliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776–1784.
Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1711–1726.
Michelini, C., & Pickford, M. (1985). Estimating the Herfindahl Index from concentration ratio data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(390), 301–305.
OECD. (2009). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2009. Paris: OECD.
Shelton, R. D., & Holdridge, G. M. (2004). The US–EU race for leadership of science and technology: Qualitative and quantitative indicators. Scientometrics, 60(3), 353–363.
Shirakawa, N., Nomura, M., Okuwada, K., & Furukawa, T. (2011). On global diffusion of electrical and electronics engineering research: An extensive quantitative analysis of IEEE publications (1980–2008). Proc. IEEE 1st International Technology Management Conference (pp. 165–172). San Jose, CA, USA.
Wainer, J., Oliveira, H. P., & Anido, R. (2011a). Patterns of bibliographic references in the ACM published papers. Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 135–142.
Wainer, J., Goldenstein, S., & Billa, C. (2011b). Invisible work in standard bibliometric evaluation of computer science. Communications of the ACM, 54(5), 141–148.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 25(1), 83–104.
This study was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) No. 22500875 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
About this article
Cite this article
Shirakawa, N., Furukawa, T., Nomura, M. et al. Global competition and technological transition in electrical, electronic, information and communication engineering: quantitative analysis of periodicals and conference proceedings of the IEEE. Scientometrics 91, 895–910 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0566-8
- Conference proceedings
- Quantitative analysis
- Tri-polar structure
- Technological transition