Scientometrics

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 185–202 | Cite as

International mobility of researchers in robotics, computer vision and electron devices: A quantitative and comparative analysis

  • Takao Furukawa
  • Nobuyuki Shirakawa
  • Kumi Okuwada
  • Kazuya Sasaki
Article

Abstract

We investigated author information in scientific articles by approximately 7,000 researchers for a quantitative analysis of researchers’ international mobility. From top journals, we traced the movements of more than 2,200 researchers in the research domains of robotics, computer vision and electron devices. We categorized countries’ characteristics for the balance between the inflow and the outflow of researchers moving internationally. Flow patterns of international mobility confirm that the United States, China and India exhibit the greatest global flows of researchers, with Singapore and Hong Kong attracting remarkable numbers of researchers from other countries. International mobility focusing on institutions reveals that universities in Singapore receive as many foreign researchers as do research universities in the United States. Furthermore, firms and international collaborative research institutes act as alternative receivers to the universities in the electron devices research domain.

Keywords

International mobility Quantitative analysis Flow pattern of researchers Institutional-level analysis 

References

  1. Cañibano, C., Otamendi, J., & Andújar, I. (2008). Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: The case of the Ramóny Cajal programme in Spain. Research Evaluation, 17(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CD, O. E. (2008). The global competition for talent: Mobility of the highly skilled. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  3. CD, O. E. (2010a). Education at a glance 2010: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  4. CD, O. E. (2010b). International migration outlook 2010. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  5. Commander, S., KAngasniermi, M., Winter, L. A. (2003). The brain drain: Curse or boon? IZA Discussion Paper, No. 809.Google Scholar
  6. Davenport, S. (2004). Panic and panacea: Brain drain and science and technology human capital policy. Research Policy, 33(4), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–3471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40, 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filippo, D. D., Casado, E. S., & Gómez, S. C. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: A case study of a Spanish university. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman, R. B. (2006). People flows in globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furukawa, T., Shirakawa, N., & Okuwada, K. (2011). Quantitative analysis of collaborative and mobility networks. Scientometrics, 87(3), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grip, A, Fouarge, D. and Sauermann, J. (2010). What affects international migration of European science and engineering graduates?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(5), 2010.Google Scholar
  14. Hunter, R. S., Oswald, A. J., & Charlton, B. G. (2009). The elite brain drain. Economic Journal, 119(538), F231–F251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inzelt, A. (2008). The inflow of highly skilled workers into Hungary: A by-product of FDI. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2004). Global estimates of high-level brain drain and deficit. Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 18(9), 936–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laudel, G. (2003). Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? Scientometrics, 57(2), 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laudel, G. (2005). Migration currents among the scientific elite. Minerva, 43(4), 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahroum, S. (2005). The international policies of brain gain. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(2), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mangematin, V. (2000). PhD job market: Professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD. Research Policy, 29(6), 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Özden, C., & Schiff, M. (2005). International migration remittances and the brain drain. New York: The World Bank and Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Regets, M. C. (2007). Research issues in the international migration of highly skilled workers: A perspective with data from the United States, working paper, SRS 07-203, NSF.Google Scholar
  24. Sandström, U. (2009). Combing curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: Mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saxenian, A. L. (2002). Brain circulation: How high skill immigration makes everyone better off. The Brookings Review, 20(1), 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saxenian, A. L. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SF, N. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Sidhu, R., Ho, K.-C., & Yeoh, B. (2010). Emerging education hubs: The case of Singapore. Higher Education, 61(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Solimano, A. (2008). The international mobility of talent: types causes and development impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (2001). Exceptional contribution to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review, 20(1–2), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thorn, K. & Holm-Nielsen, L. B. (2006). International mobility of researchers and scientist: Policy options for tuing a drain into gain, No RP2006/83, Working Papers, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takao Furukawa
    • 1
  • Nobuyuki Shirakawa
    • 1
  • Kumi Okuwada
    • 1
  • Kazuya Sasaki
    • 2
  1. 1.Science and Technology Foresight CenterNational Institute of Science and Technology PolicyChuyoda-kuJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUtsunomiya UniversityUtsunomiyaJapan

Personalised recommendations