Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network
- 1.4k Downloads
Although co-authorship in scientific research has a long history the analysis of co-authorship network to explore scientific collaboration among authors is a relatively new research area. Studies of current literature about co-authorship networks mostly give emphasis to understand patterns of scientific collaborations, to capture collaborative statistics, and to propose valid and reliable measures for identifying prominent author(s). However, there is no such study in the literature which conducts a longitudinal analysis of co-authorship networks. Using a dataset that spans over 20 years, this paper attempts to explore efficiency and trend of co-authorship networks. Two scientists are considered connected if they have co-authored a paper, and these types of connections between two scientists eventually constitute co-authorship networks. Co-authorship networks evolve among researchers over time in specific research domains as well as in interdisciplinary research areas. Scientists from diverse research areas and different geographical locations may participate in one specific co-authorship network whereas an individual scientist may belong to different co-authorship networks. In this paper, we study a longitudinal co-authorship network of a specific scientific research area. By applying approaches to analyze longitudinal network data, in addition to known methods and measures of current co-authorship literature, we explore a co-authorship network of a relatively young and emerging research discipline to understand its trend of evolution pattern and proximity of efficiency.
KeywordsCo-authorship network Trend analysis Efficiency analysis Inter-country collaboration
- Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346–359.Google Scholar
- Cho, C. C., Hu, M. W., & Liu, M. C. (2010). Improvements in productivity based on co-authorship: a case study of published articles in China. Scientometrics, 85(2), 463–470.Google Scholar
- Ding-quan, C., Wei-feng, Z., & Xiu-juan, M. (2009). Study of the periodical paper co-authorship of library and information science: 1999–2002. Information Science. doi: CNKI:SUN:QBKX.0.2009-01-015.
- Grossman, J. W., & Ion, P. D. F. (1995). On a portion of the well-known collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium 108, 129–132.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, P. (1998). The man who loved only numbers: The story of Paul Erdos and the search for mathematical truth. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
- Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2011). A study of interdisciplinarity in information science: Using direct citation and co-authorship analysis. Journal of Information Science. doi: 10.1177/0165551511407141.
- Huang, T. H., & Huang, M. L. (2006). Analysis and visualization of co-authorship networks for understanding academic collaboration and knowledge domain of individual researchers. In Proceedings of CGIV'2006 (pp. 18–23).Google Scholar
- Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., & Schubert, M. (2009). Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
- Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1462–1480.Google Scholar
- Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 101.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98(2), 404.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101(Suppl 1), 5200.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2003). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar