Does cumulative advantage affect collective learning in science? An agent-based simulation
Agent-based simulation can model simple micro-level mechanisms capable of generating macro-level patterns, such as frequency distributions and network structures found in bibliometric data. Agent-based simulations of organisational learning have provided analogies for collective problem solving by boundedly rational agents employing heuristics. This paper brings these two areas together in one model of knowledge seeking through scientific publication. It describes a computer simulation in which academic papers are generated with authors, references, contents, and an extrinsic value, and must pass through peer review to become published. We demonstrate that the model can fit bibliometric data for a token journal, Research Policy. Different practices for generating authors and references produce different distributions of papers per author and citations per paper, including the scale-free distributions typical of cumulative advantage processes. We also demonstrate the model’s ability to simulate collective learning or problem solving, for which we use Kauffman’s NK fitness landscape. The model provides evidence that those practices leading to cumulative advantage in citations, that is, papers with many citations becoming even more cited, do not improve scientists’ ability to find good solutions to scientific problems, compared to those practices that ignore past citations. By contrast, what does make a difference is referring only to publications that have successfully passed peer review. Citation practice is one of many issues that a simulation model of science can address when the data-rich literature on scientometrics is connected to the analogy-rich literature on organisations and heuristic search.
KeywordsSimulation Cumulative advantage Landscape search Science models Science policy
Mathematic subject classification91D10 (primary) 91D30 90B70
JEL classificationC63 D83 D85
This research was supported by SIMIAN (Simulation Innovation: A Node), a part of the UK’s National Centre for Research Methods, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.
- Ahrweiler, P., & Gilbert, G. N. (2005). Caffè Nero: The evaluation of social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4), 14. Retrieved 26, Feb 2010 from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/14.html.
- Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bentley, R. A., Ormerod, P., & Batty, M. (2009). An evolutionary model of long tailed distributions in the social sciences. arXiv:0903.2533v1 [physics.soc-ph] March 14, 2009. Retrieved 1, May 2010 from http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0903/0903.2533v1.pdf.
- Boerner, K., Maru, J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 101(suppl. 1), S266–S273.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. (2005). Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: a global theory of intellectual change. London: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Corne, D., Dorigo, M., & Glover, F. (Eds.). (1999). New ideas in optimisation. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, N. (1997). A simulation of the structure of academic science. Sociological Research Online, 2(2), 3. Retrieved 10, Feb 2009 from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/3.html.
- Gilbert, G. N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Glaenzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1990). The cumulative advantage function. A mathematical formulation based on conditional expectations and its application to scientometric distributions. Informetrics, 89/90, 139–147.Google Scholar
- Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3), 2. Retrieved 28, Sep 2009 from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html.
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: the search for laws of complexity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 21–52). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323.Google Scholar
- March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, M. (1996). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Price, D. J. de S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Price, D. J. de S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.Google Scholar
- Price, D. J. de S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 292–306.Google Scholar
- Sandstrom, P. E. (1999). Scholars as subsistence foragers. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(3), 17–20.Google Scholar
- Scharnhorst, A. (2002). Evolution in adaptive landscapes - examples of science and technology development. Discussion Paper FS II 00–302. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
- Scharnhorst, A., & Ebeling, W. (2005). Evolutionary search agents in complex landscapes. A new model for the role of competence and meta-competence (EVOLINO and other simulation tools). arXiv:0511232. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511232.
- Steels, L. (2001). The methodology of the artificial. Commentary on Webb, B. (2001) Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(6), 1071–1072. Retrieved May 5 2008 from http://www.csl.sony.fr/downloads/papers/2001/steels.html.
- Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar