Scientometrics

, 88:1005 | Cite as

Letter to the Editor: Comments on the paper of Franceschini and Maisano: Proposals for evaluating the regularity of a scientist’s research output

Article
First Online:
Received:
  • 154 Downloads

Keywords

Entropy Average Impact Quality Work Entropy Term High Quality Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2011). Proposals for evaluating the regularity of a scientist’s research output. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0371-4
  2. Glanzel, W. (2006). On the h-index–A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Glanzel, W. (2008). On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. OR 0801. KU Leuven.Google Scholar
  4. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Prathap, G. (2011). The Energy–Exergy–Entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0367-0
  7. Schubert, A., & Glanzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR National Institute of Science Communication and Information ResourcesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations