A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization
- 521 Downloads
A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most frequently publishing Spanish universities shows large differences in the publication activity and citation impact among research disciplines within an institution. Gini Index is a useful measure of an institution’s disciplinary specialization and can roughly categorize universities in terms of general versus specialized. A study of the Spanish academic system reveals that assessment of a university’s research performance must take into account the disciplinary breadth of its publication activity and citation impact. It proposes the use of graphs showing not only a university’s article production and citation impact, but also its disciplinary specialization. Such graphs constitute both a warning and a remedy against one-dimensional approaches to the assessment of institutional research performance.
KeywordsUniversity rankings Disciplinary specialization Academic systems Spanish academic system Institutional research performance Bibliometrics
- Aguillo, I. F., Ortega, J. L., & Fernández, M. (2008). Webometric ranking of World Universities: introduction, methodology, and future developments. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 234–244.Google Scholar
- AUBR (2009). Expert Group on the Assessment of University-Based Research. Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research. European Commission—DG Research. http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/index_en.cfm?l1=23&l2=0&l3=1&newsletter=18_02.
- CEPES (2006). The Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. http://www.che.de/downloads/Berlin_Principles_IREG_534.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2009.
- CL-CSIC (2009). Ranking Web of World Universities, Cybermetrics Lab CSIC. http://www.webometrics.info/. Accessed 22 July 2009.
- CWTS (2009). Leiden World Ranking, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, University of Leiden. http://www.cwts.nl/ranking/LeidenRankingWebsite.html. Accessed 22 July 2009.
- Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- HEEACT (2009). Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities, Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. http://ranking.heeact.edu.tw/en-us/2008/page/Background. Accessed 22 July 2009.
- IREG (2009). International Observatory on Academic Rankings and Excellence. http://www.ireg-observatory.org/index.php?option=com_frontpageandItemid=1. Accessed 22 July 2009.
- Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2008). Examining major rankings according to the Berlin principles. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 201–208.Google Scholar
- Rousseau, R. (1992a). Concentration and diversity measures in informetric research. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.Google Scholar
- Rousseau, R. (1992b). Specialization and Diversity in Informetric Research. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.Google Scholar
- Salmi, J. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities, World Bank: Washington.Google Scholar
- SCImago (2010). The SIR 2009 World Report. http://www.scimagoir.com/. Accessed 8 August 2010.
- Scopus (2010). What does it cover? http://info.scopus.com/scopus-in-detail/facts/. Accessed 8 August 2010.
- SJTU (2007). Academic Ranking of World Universities, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. http://www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ranking2007.htm. Accessed 22 July 2009.
- Times QS (2009). Times QS World University Rankings. http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/university_rankings_home/. Accessed 22 July 2009.