Bibliometric analysis of complementary and alternative medicine research over three decades
- 308 Downloads
This study applies bibliometric analysis to investigate the quantity and citation impact of scientific papers in the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The data are collected from 19 CAM journals in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database during 1980–2009, and 17,002 papers are identified for analysis. The study analyzes the document types, geographical and institutional distribution of the authorship, including international scientific collaboration. This study suggests that the major type of document is original article. The CAM papers are mostly published by North America, East Asia, and European countries, of which publications authored in East Asia are cited most. Country-wise, major contributors of CAM papers are from USA, People’s Republic of China, India, England and Germany. India has the highest CPP value, attracting high attentions in CAM community. This article also finds that international co-authorship in the CAM field has increased rapidly during this period. In addition, internationally collaborated publications generate higher citation impact than papers published by authors from single country. Finally, the research identifies productive institutions in CAM, and China Medical University located in Taiwan is the most productive organization.
KeywordsComplementary medicine Alternative medicine CAM Bibliometric analysis
- Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for Industry on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Produces and Their Regulation by the Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved November 26, 2010 from http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06d-0480-gld0001.pdf.
- Gehanno, J. F., Takahashi, K., Darmoni, S., & Weber, J. (2007). Citation classics in occupational medicine journals. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 33(4), 245–251.Google Scholar
- Gray, C. M., Tan, A. W. H., Pronk, N. P., & O’Connor, P. J. (2002). Complementary and alternative medicine use among health plan members. A cross-sectional survey. Effective Clinical Practice, 5(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
- Hesketh, T., & Zhu, W. X. (1997). Health in China—Traditional Chinese medicine: One country, two systems. British Medical Journal, 315(7100), 115–117.Google Scholar
- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (2004). Expanding Horizons of Health Care Strategic Plan 2005–2009. Maryland: NIH.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, K., Pittler, M. H., & Ernst, E. (2001). A profile of journals of complementary and alternative medicine. Swiss Medical Weekly, 131(39–40), 588–591.Google Scholar
- Sharma, H., Chandola, H. M., Singh, G., & Basisht, G. (2007). Utilization of ayurveda in health care: An approach for prevention, health promotion, and treatment of disease. Part 2—Ayurveda in primary health care. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13(10), 1135–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomson Reuters. (2010). Science citation index expanded. Retrieved April 2, 2010 from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/science_citation_index_expanded/.
- Tindle, H. A., Davis, R. B., Phillips, R. S., & Eisenberg, D. M. (2005). Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 11(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
- Wahlberg, A. (2006). Bio-politics and the promotion of traditional herbal medicine in Vietnam. Health, 10(2), 123–147.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2002). WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
- Zhong, H. L., & Jia, Q. (2006). Survey report of national healthcare system in North Korea (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, 13(2), 89–90.Google Scholar