Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Anne-Wil Harzing: The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis

Tarma Software Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia, c2010, ISBN 978-0-9808485-1-9, US$49.95 (paperback, black and white), US$74.95 (paperback, color)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic ranking. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 72–95.

  2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index—A comparison of WoS, scopus and google scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.

  3. Bensman, S. J. (2007a). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93–155.

  4. Bensman, S.J. (2007b). Garfield and the Impact Factor: The creation, utilization, and validation of a citation measure: Part 2, The probabilistic, statistical, and sociological bases of the measure. Baton Rouge: Unpublished. Available on the Web site of Dr. Eugene Garfield at the following URL: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/bensman/bensmanegif22007.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2011.

  5. Bensman, S. J. (2008). Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1097–1117.

  6. Bensman, S. J., Smolinsky, L. J., & Pudovkin, A. I. (2010). Mean citation rate per article in mathematics journals: Differences from the scientific model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1440–1463.

  7. Burright, M. (2006). Google scholar—science and technology. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Winter, 1–4.

  8. Dixon, L., et al. (2010). Finding articles and journals via Google Scholar, journal portals, and link resolvers: Usability study results. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 50(2), 170–181.

  9. Harzing, A.-W., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 61–73.

  10. Jacsó, P. (2009a). Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators with the Publish or Perish software. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1468–4527.

  11. Jacsó, P. (2009b). Google Scholar’s ghost authors. Library Journal, 134(18), 26–27.

  12. London School of Economics and Political Science. (2011). Impact of the social sciences: Maximizing the impact of academic research. Available online at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/. Accessed 28 March 2011.

  13. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

  14. van Raan, T. (2010). Measure for measure. Nature, 468(7325), 763.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stephen J. Bensman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bensman, S.J. Anne-Wil Harzing: The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Scientometrics 88, 339–342 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0388-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Citation Analysis
  • Scientometric Indicator
  • Institutional Entrepreneur
  • Academic Evaluation
  • Journal Review Article