Scientometrics

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 521–533 | Cite as

A decade of database research publications: a look inside

Article

Abstract

The database management technology has played a vital role in the advancements of the information technology field. Database researchers are one of the key players and main sources to the growth of the database systems. They are playing a foundational role in creating the technological infrastructure from which database advancements evolve. We analyze the database research publications of nine top-tier and prestigious database research venues. In particular, we study the publications of four major core database technology conferences (SIGMOD, VLDB, ICDE, EDBT), two main theoretical database conferences (PODS, ICDT) and three database journals (TODS, VLDB Journal, TKDE) over a period of 10 years (2001–2010). Our analysis considers only regular papers as we do not include short papers, demo papers, posters, tutorials or panels into our statistics. In this study, we report the list of the authors with the highest number of publications for each conference/journal separately and in combined. We analyze the preference of the database research community towards publishing their work in prestigious conferences or major database journals. We report about the most successful co-authorship relationships in the database research community in the last decade. Finally, we analyze the growth in the number of research publications and the size of the research community in the last decade.

Keywords

Database research venues Top publishers 

References

  1. Agrawal, D., Das, S., & Abbadi, A. E. (2010). Big data and cloud computing: New wine or just new bottles? Proceedings of the VLDB, 3(2), 1647–1648.Google Scholar
  2. Ailamaki, A., Haas, L. M., Jagadish, H. V., Maier, D., Ozsu, M. T., & Winslett, M. (2010). Time for our field to grow up. Proceedings of the VLDB, 3(2), 1658.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, T. R., Hankin, R. K. S., & Killworth, P. D. (2008). Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76(3), 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, P. A., DeWitt, D. J., Heuer, A., Ives, Z. G., Jensen, C. S., Meyer, H. et al. (2005). Database Publication Practices. In Vldb, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1241–1246). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/vldb/BernsteinH07.
  6. Chen, J., & Konstan, J. A. (2010). Conference paper selectivity and impact. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 79–83.Google Scholar
  7. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Florescu, D. (2004). Database research for the current millennium. In Icde, Boston, MA, USA (p. 866). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/icde/Florescu04.
  9. Fortnow, L. (2009). Viewpoint—Time for computer science to grow up. Communications of the ACM, 52(8), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halevy, A. Y. (2001). Answering queries using views: A survey. VLDB Journal, 10(4), 270–294.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hellerstein, J. M., Chaudhuri, S., & Rosenblum, M. (Eds.). (2010). In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, SoCC 2010, Indianapolis, IN, 10–11 June, 2010. ACM, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.Google Scholar
  13. Krapivin, M., Marchese, M., & Casati, F. (2010). Exploring and understanding citation-based scientific metrics. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(1), 59–81.Google Scholar
  14. Larsen, P. O., and von Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lillquist, E., & Green, S. (2010). The discipline dependence of citation statistics. Scientometrics, 84(3), 749–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moro, M. M., Braganholo, V. P., Dorneles, C. F., Duarte, D., de Matos Galante, R., & dos Santos Mello, R. (2009). XML: Some papers in a haystack. SIGMOD Record, 38(2), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001). A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal, 10(4), 334–350.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rahm, E., & Thor, A. (2005). Citation analysis of database publications. SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi, X., Tseng, B. L., & Adamic, L. A. (2009). Information diffusion in computer science citation networks. In Icwsm, San Jose, California, USA. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/icwsm/ShiTA09.
  21. Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snodgrass, R. T. (2003). Journal relevance. SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yan, S., & Lee, D. (2007). Toward alternative measures for ranking venues: A case of database research community. In Jcdl, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 235–244). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/jcdl/YanL07.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National ICT AustraliaUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Information TechnologiesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations