Scientometrics

, 88:321 | Cite as

On measuring scholarly influence by citations

Article

Abstract

Bibliometric measures based on citations are widely used in assessing the scientific publication records of authors, institutions and journals. Yet currently favored measures lack a clear theoretical foundation and are known to have counter-intuitive properties. The paper proposes a new approach that is grounded on a theoretical “influence function,” representing explicit prior beliefs about how citations reflect influence. Conditions are derived for robust qualitative comparisons of influence—conditions that can be implemented using readily-available data. Two examples are provided, one using the world’s top-10 economics department, the other using the top-10 economics journals.

Keywords

Citations h-Index Scientific influence Economics departments Economics journals 

References

  1. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55, 749–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalton, Hugh. (1920). The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Economic Journal, 30, 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dasgupta, P., Sen, A., & Starrett, D. (1973). Notes on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 6, 180–187.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egghe, Leo. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engemann, K. M., & Wall, H. J. (2009). A journal ranking for the ambitious economist. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 91(3), 127–139.Google Scholar
  8. Hadar, J., & Russell, W. R. (1971). Stochastic dominance and diversification. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 288–305.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102(46), 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oswald, A. J. (2007). An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers. Economica, 74(293), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shorrocks, A. F. (1983). Ranking income distributions. Economica, 50, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vanclay, J. (2007). On the robustness of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Woeginger, G. J. (2008a). An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-Index. Mathematical Social Sciences, 56, 224–232.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Woeginger, G. J. (2008b). An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Development Research GroupWorld BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations