The evolution of the international business field: a scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal
- 1.4k Downloads
Macro-environmental trends such as technological changes, declining trade and investment barriers, and globalizing forces impacting both markets and production worldwide point to the heightened importance of international business (IB) and the relevance of IB research today. Despite this, a leading scholar has expressed concerns that the IB research agenda could be ‘running out of steam’ (Buckley, Journal of International Business Studies 33(2):365–373, 2002), prompting on-going introspection within the IB field. We contribute to this debate by investigating the evolution of the IB field through a scientometric examination of articles published in its premier journal, the Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) from 1970 until 2008. We introduce a new analytical tool, Leximancer, to the fields of international business and scientometry. We show an evolution from an initial and extended emphasis on macro-environmental issues to a more recent focus on micro-economic, firm-level ones with the multinational enterprise (MNE) as an organizational form enduring throughout the entire period. We observe a field that has established a justifiable claim for relevance, participating actively in the interdisciplinary exchange of ideas.
KeywordsInternational business Scholarly field Evolution Concepts Leximancer
The authors are grateful for the constructive comments made by the reviewers throughout the review process, and thank Dr. David Rooney, UQ Business School, The University of Queensland for his most useful assistance with Leximancer in the formative stages of this project.
- Beamish, P. W. (1993). Letter from the Editor-in-Chief. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(1), front-pages.Google Scholar
- Chabowski, B. R., Hult, G. T. M., Kiyak, T., & Mena, J. A. (2010). The structure of JIBS’s social network and the relevance of intra-country variation: A typology for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(6), 925–934.Google Scholar
- Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1998). The Impact Factor and using it correctly. Der Unfallchirurg, 101(6), 413–414.Google Scholar
- Hofer, K. M., Smejkal, A. E., Bilgin, F. Z., & Wuehrer, G. A. (2010). Conference proceedings as a matter of bibliometric studies: The Academy of International Business 2006–2008. Scientometrics, 84, 845–862. online doi: 10.1007/S11192-010-0216-6.
- Journal of International Business Studies. (2011). Retrieved January 17, 2011 from http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/index.html.
- Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Letter from the Editor. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
- Leximancer (2009). Leximancer: The why, not just the what. Leximancer Manual, Version 3.07. Brisbane, QLD: Leximancer Pty. Ltd., The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Ricks, D. A. (1991). Letter from the Editor-in-Chief. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), front-pages.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. E. (2003). Automatic extraction of semantic networks from text using Leximancer. Paper presented at the Human Language Technology Conference, Edmonton.Google Scholar
- Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational functions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
- Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar