, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 687–694 | Cite as

Forecasting trends of development of psychology from a bibliometric perspective

  • Günter KrampenEmail author
  • Alexander von Eye
  • Gabriel Schui


Bibliometric data on psychology publications from 1977 through 2008 are modeled and forecasted for the 10 years following 2008. Data refer to the raw frequencies of the PsycINFO (94% English-language, mainly Anglo-American publications) and the English-language documents of PSYNDEX (publications from the German-speaking countries). The series were modelled by way of exponential smoothing. In contrast to Single Moving Average methods which do not weigh observations, exponential smoothing assigns differential weights to observations. Weights reflect the distance from the most recent data point. Results suggest strongly expanding publication activities which can be represented by exponential functions. In addition, forecasted publication activities, estimated based on psychology publication frequencies in the past, show positive bibliometric trends in the Anglo-American research community. These trends go in parallel the bibliometric trends for the English-language publications of German-speaking authors. However, while positive trends were forecasted for all psychological subdisciplines of the Anglo-American publication database PsycINFO, negative bibliometric trends were estimated for English-language publications from German-speaking authors in 6 out of 20 subdisciplines.


Bibliometry Scientometry Psychology History of psychology Forecasted developmental trends 


  1. Albarrán, P., Crespo, J. A., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2010). A comparison of the scientific performance of the U.S. and the European Union at the turn of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 85, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, D. (1985). Vorwort des Herausgebers [Preface of the editor]. In D. Albert (Ed.), Bericht über den 34. Kongreß der DGFPs in Wien 1984, Proceedings of the 34th Congress of the German Psychological Association in Vienna 1984 (Vol. 1, pp. V–VIII). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  3. Bättig, K. (1976). Thematische Gliederung der psychologischen Fachliteratur von 1958 bis 1974 [Thematic structure of psychological literature from 1958 through 1974]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen, 35, 212–217.Google Scholar
  4. Behrens, H., & Luksch, P. (2011). Mathematics 1868–2008: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 86, 179–194.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cattell, J. Mc K. (1903). Statistics of American psychologists. American Journal of Psychology, 14, 310–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallagher Tuleya, L. (Ed.). (2007). Thesaurus of psychological index terms (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2010). International collaboration in psychology on the rise. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0299-0.
  8. Krampen, G. (2009). Introduction and some ideas as well as visions on an open access European psychology publication platform. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(Suppl. 1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  9. Krampen, G., & Montada, L. (1998). Health psychology: Bibliometrical results on the emergence and rapid consolidation of a new field of research and application. Psychology and Health, 13, 1027–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krampen, G., & Schui, G. (2009). Entwicklungslinien der Psychologie in quantitative-bibliometrischer Sicht [Developmental trends of psychology in a quantitative-bibliometric perspective]. In G. Krampen (Ed.), Psychologie: Experten als Zeitzeugen [Psychology: Experts as Zeitzeugen] (pp. 19–31). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  11. Krampen, G., Montada, L., Müller, M. M., & Schui, G. (2005). Internationalität und Internationalisierung der deutschsprachigen Psychologie [Internationality and internationalization of psychology in the German-speaking countries]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  12. Krampen, G., Huckert, T., & Schui, G. (2011). Impact of anglicizing former German-language psychology journals on authorships and citation freqeuncies. European Psychologist (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  13. Larsen, P. O., & von Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84, 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schoepflin, U., & Müller-Brettel, M. (1990). International Journal of Behavioral Development: Scope and trends. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 393–406.Google Scholar
  15. Schui, G., & Krampen, G. (2010). Bibliometric analyses on the emergence and present growth of Positive Psychology. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wertheimer, M. j. (1970). A brief history of psychology. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günter Krampen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander von Eye
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gabriel Schui
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz-Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID)University of TrierTrierGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations